Method for using mustard meal or an extract thereof

ABSTRACT

Disclosed are embodiments of a method of using mustard meal or mustard meal extract. Certain embodiments concern controlling vegetable sprouting, such as potato sprouting. Vegetables, such as potatoes, may be exposed to products resulting from mustard meal, or an extract thereof, contacting water. Other embodiments concern a process for controlling plant pests, such as insects, nematodes, fungi, weeds, and combinations thereof, with specific embodiments being particularly useful for weed suppression. Certain embodiments comprise extracting glucosinolates from plant material, or processed plant material, selected from the family Brassicaceae, particularly from the genera Brassica and Sinapis. Extracted glucosinolates can be hydrolyzed to form active compounds, or alternatively, they can be hydrolyzed in situ, by simultaneously or sequentially applying myrosinase. The extract can be applied to plants, to the soil adjacent to the plant.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No.15/863,680, filed on Jan. 5, 2018, which is a continuation ofInternational Application No. PCT/US2016/041361, filed on Jul. 7, 2016,which was published in English under PCT Article 21(2), which in turnclaims the benefit of the earlier filing date of U.S. provisional patentapplication No. 62/190,552, filed Jul. 9, 2015, all of which areincorporated herein by reference in their entireties.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF GOVERNMENT SUPPORT

This invention was made with government support under Agriculture andFood Research Initiative competitive grant 2011-67009-20094 awarded byUnited States Department of Agriculture National Institute of Food andAgriculture. The government has certain rights in the invention.

FIELD

Disclosed embodiments of the present invention concern extracts fromSinapis alba or Brassica juncea and their use in agriculture.

BACKGROUND

Currently, there is a strong desire by consumers to use products thatare produced without using synthetic pesticides. Many commonly usedpesticides are no longer used, or their use soon will be discontinued.For example, the use of methyl bromide is being restricted. This desirefor consumers to have substantially synthetic pesticide-free materialsmust be balanced by the practicalities required for feeding anever-increasing world-wide population. Thus, some method of controllingweeds and/or insects must be implemented.

Farmers throughout the world are constantly looking for ways to improvesoil quality, reduce inputs, and enhance yield and produce quality. Theuse of plant materials to suppress soil-borne pests and plant pathogenshas been referred to as “biofumigation” and the species used as“biofumigants.” Pest and disease suppression are not the only advantagesof using biofumigants. Species such as oilseed radish have shown highpotential to increase soil aeration and to scavenge residual nitrogen.Several research studies have recently been published and many arecurrently ongoing throughout the nation and the world to betterunderstand and quantify the contributions of biofumigants to croppingsystems.

Plants may produce compounds that directly or indirectly affect theirbiological environment. These compounds fall within a broad category ofcompounds called allelochemicals, and are exclusive of food thatinfluences growth, health, or behavior of other organisms. One reasonfor interest in allelochemicals is their potential for use inalternative pest management systems. Using plant-producedallelochemicals in agricultural and horticultural practices couldminimize synthetic pesticide use, reduce the associated potential forenvironmental contamination, and contribute to a more sustainableagricultural system.

SUMMARY

Disclosed herein are embodiments of a method comprising controllingpotato sprouting by using Brassica juncea seed meal or extract or acombination thereof. The amount of Brassica juncea seed meal or extractor a combination thereof, used may be up to one gram per 225 kg ofpotatoes, such as from one gram per 1.5 kg to one gram per 50 kg ofpotatoes. In some embodiments, controlling comprises exposing potatoesto first products made by forming a first aqueous composition comprisingthe Brassica juncea seed meal or extract or a combination thereof.Exposing the potatoes may comprise forming the first aqueous compositionin the presence of the potatoes; applying the first products to thepotatoes; spraying or fogging the atmosphere of a potato storagefacility with the first products, or a combination thereof.

Forming the first aqueous composition may comprise using an amount ofwater sufficient to make the first products, such as from 1 mL to 30 mL,or from 5 mL to 10 mL per gram of Brassica juncea seed meal or extractor a combination thereof. The Brassica juncea seed meal or extract or acombination thereof, may comprise an amount of sinigrin sufficient toproduce an amount of hydrolysis products sufficient to substantiallypreclude potato sprouting. The amount may be from greater than zero to2000 μmol, or from 350 μmol to 1000 μmol per gram of Brassica junceaseed meal or extract or a combination thereof.

Certain embodiments comprise exposing the potatoes to second productsmade by forming a second aqueous composition comprising Brassica junceaseed meal or extract or a combination thereof. A time period between thepotatoes being exposed to the first and second products may besufficient to substantially maintain inhibition of potato sprouting,such as from 1 week to 12 weeks, or from 4 weeks to 8 weeks. Particularembodiments comprise exposing potatoes to first products made by forminga first composition comprising from 5 mL to 10 mL of water and one gramof Brassica juncea seed meal or extract or a combination thereof, forevery 200 pounds of potatoes; and exposing the potatoes to secondproducts at a time point of from 4 weeks to 8 weeks after exposing thepotatoes to the first products, the second products being made byforming a second composition comprising from 5 mL to 10 mL of water andone gram of Brassica juncea seed meal or extract or a combinationthereof, for every 200 pounds of potatoes.

Also disclosed are embodiments of a process for controlling plant pestsand/or suppressing weeds in plant crops. For example, the method may bepracticed to control insects, nematodes, fungi, weeds, and combinationsthereof, with specific embodiments being particularly useful for weedsuppression. One disclosed embodiment comprises extracting plantmaterial selected from the family Brassicaceae, particularly from thegenera Brassica and Sinapis, and more particularly from Sinapis alba orBrassica juncea. In some embodiments, the plant material is a seed meal.The plant material may be homogenized and/or ground prior to theextraction.

The plant material is extracted with a solvent system comprising analcohol and water. The extracts thus obtained are concentrated and driedby suitable techniques including spray drying or belt drying, to producenon-deliquescent solids. The extraction solvent may comprise from 10% to90% alcohol and from 90% to 10% water. The alcohol comprise methanol,ethanol or a combination thereof.

In particular embodiments, the plant material is Sinapis alba, and theextraction solvent comprises 30% ethanol and 70% water. The extractionmay be performed for a period of time up to at least 3 days, such asfrom greater than zero to 12 hours, from greater than zero to 24 hours,from greater than zero to 48 hours, or from greater than zero to 72hours. The extract may comprise 4-hydroxybenzyl alcohol, SCN⁻, and/or4-hydroxyphenylacetonitrile. In other embodiments, the plant material isBrassica juncea and the extraction solvent is 70% ethanol and 30% water.

The extracts may be spray dried, belt dried or freeze dried.

Also disclosed herein are embodiments of a method for using theextracts. The extract may be applied to liverwort, or to the soiladjacent to liverwort. The extract may comprise 4-hydroxybenzyl alcohol,SCN⁻, and 4-hydroxyphenylacetonitrile. The seed meal or an extractthereof may also be applied to potatoes to prevent or substantiallyinhibit growth of potato sprouts. In some embodiments, the extracts areformulated as a solution in water.

The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of theinvention will become more apparent from the following detaileddescription, which proceeds with reference to the accompanying figures.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a graph of glucosinolate concentrations (μmol glucosinolatesper gram seed meal determined without using a response factor) forvarious plant materials as determined using hot water (ht) and methanol(me) extractions. Athena and Dwarf Essex are B. napus species, Ida is aS. alba species, and Pac Gold is a B. juncea species. Ida samples m4 andm5 represent two different S. alba meal samples.

FIG. 2 provides first-order plots for the disappearance of4-hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanate incubated in buffered aqueous solutionswith pH values ranging from 3.0 to 6.5, where plots for pH 3.0 and 3.5are superimposed on each other in the graph.

FIG. 3 is a graph of glucosinolate concentrations (μmol glucosinolatesper gram seed meal determined without using a response factor) forvarious plant materials to compare total glucosinolates in stored (old)or freshly pressed (new) meals. Athena and Dwarf Essex are B. napusspecies, IdaGold is a S. alba species, and Pac Gold is a B. junceaspecies.

FIG. 4 is a photograph illustrating the effects of Sinapis alba for weedcontrol as compared to a no-meal control in a greenhouse trial conductedwith soil. The weeds include wild oat and redroot pigweed.

FIG. 5 provides two photographs of potatoes, illustrating that thegrowth of potato sprouts is inhibited or substantially prevented bytreatment with B. juncea seed meal and water.

FIG. 6 is a plot of seed or seedling mortality versus percent S. albameal amendment for two common weeds grown in a silt loam soil. Mealamendment is expressed on a weight basis for the ratio of the meal tothe soil.

FIG. 7 is a plot of percentage of dead liverwort tissue versus time,illustrating that the efficiency of an exemplary mustard meal extract iscomparable to commercial pesticides.

FIG. 8 is an HPLC/UV chromatogram of a 30% aqueous ethanol extract ofSinapis alba eluted with 0-20% methanol, illustrating the presence of4-hydroxybenzyl alcohol.

FIG. 9 is an ion chromatogram of a 30% aqueous ethanol extract ofSinapis alba eluted with 0-20% methanol, illustrating the presence ofsulfate ions.

FIG. 10 is an HPLC/UV chromatogram of a 30% aqueous ethanol extract ofSinapis alba eluted with 0-20% methanol, illustrating the presence of4-hydroxyphenyl acetonitrile.

FIG. 11 provides images illustrating the results of contacting liverwortwith a mustard meal extract, 4-hydroxybenzyl alcohol, 4-hydroxybenzeneacetonitrile or SCN⁻ ions, compared to water.

FIG. 12 is a plot of percentage of dead liverwort tissue, illustratingthe effects of applying various compositions to liverwort.

FIG. 13 is a plot of pH of hydrolysate and percentage of sinalbinhydrolyzed versus expected total concentration, illustrating thehydrolysis of S. alba mustard extract (0.05-0.3 g) in the presence ofmustard meal (0.1 g) in 2.5 mL of water.

FIG. 14 is a plot of pH of hydrolysate and percentage of sinalbinhydrolyzed versus expected total concentration, illustrating thehydrolysis of B. juncea mustard extract (0.05-0.3 g) in the presence ofmustard meal (0.1 g) in 2.5 mL of water.

FIG. 15 is a plot of glucosinolate hydrolyzed versus pH, illustratingthe hydrolysis of S. alba and B. juncea mustard extracts (0.15 g) in thepresence of mustard meal (0.1 g) in 2.5 mL of 200 mM phosphate buffer.

FIG. 16 is a plot of mass balance closure versus ascorbateconcentration, illustrating the effect of ascorbate addition on theproduction of allyl isothiocyanate and ionic thiocyanate from B. junceaand S. alba mustard powder.

FIG. 17 is a plot of sinalbin hydrolysis versus time, illustrating thehydrolysis of S. alba and B. juncea mustard extracts (0.15 g) in thepresence of mustard meal (0.1 g) in 2.5 mL of 150 mM phosphate buffer or150 mM potassium bicarbonate.

FIG. 18 illustrates the production of ionic thiocyanate from S. albaseed meal incubated in deionized water and aqueous solutions buffered atpH values ranging from 4.0 to 7.0.

FIG. 19 is a plot showing continuous and periodic extraction into ethylacetate of 4-hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanate resulting from hydrolysis of4-OH benzyl glucosinolate contained in S. alba seed meal as compared tosimilar extractions of benzyl isothiocyanate from aqueous solution.4-Hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanate incubations contained no seed meal, butare expressed on a weight basis for comparison purposes only.

FIG. 20 is a graph of isothiocyanate formation from B. juncea PacificGold meal product versus time (hours).

FIG. 21 is a graph of isothiocyanate formation from S. alba IdaGold mealproduct versus time (hours).

FIG. 22 is a graph of isothiocyanate formation from B. napus Dwarf Essexmeal product versus time (hours).

FIG. 23 is a graph of SCN⁻ concentration in extracts obtained from fieldsoils at various depths sampled at the noted times (days) after Sinapisalba meal amendment.

FIG. 24 is a graph of SCN⁻ concentration in soil extracts obtained fromsoils at various depths sampled at the noted times (days) after Brassicanapus meal amendment to field soil.

FIG. 25 is a graph of SCN⁻ concentration in soil extracts obtained fromsoils at various depths sampled at the noted times (days) after Brassicajuncea meal amendment to field soil.

FIG. 26 is a plot of colony diameter versus time (days) showinginhibition of F. oxysporum mycelial growth by volatile products from B.juncea Pacific Gold meal. Bj=B. juncea Pacific Gold; Bn DEx=B. napusDwarf Essex; Bn A=B. napus Athena; Sa=S. alba IdaGold; C=Control withoutmeal.

FIG. 27 is a graph of average plant weight versus dose of seed mealextract, illustrating the toxicity of S. alba seed meal extract tovarious crops and weeds.

FIG. 28 is a photograph of Oliense potatoes treated with 1 gram of B.juncea in 7 mL water, illustrating the very small amount of sproutingobserved after two months post treatment.

FIG. 29 is a photograph of Oliense potatoes not treated with B. juncea,illustrating the amount of sprouting observed after two month in storageunder the same conditions as the potatoes shown in FIG. 28.

FIG. 30 is a photograph of Cecil potatoes treated with 1 gram of B.juncea in 7 mL water, illustrating that after seven weeks in storage theB. juncea had prevented sprouting.

FIG. 31 is a photograph of Cecil potatoes treated with 0.5 grams of B.juncea in 7 mL water, illustrating that after seven weeks in storage theB. juncea had prevented sprouting.

FIG. 32 is a photograph of Cecil potatoes treated with 0.25 grams of B.juncea in 7 mL water, illustrating that after seven weeks in storageonly a small amount of sprouting was observed.

FIG. 33 is a photograph of Cecil potatoes not treated with B. juncea,illustrating that after seven weeks in storage considerable sproutingwas observed.

FIG. 34 is a photograph of Allian potatoes treated with 1 gram ofmustard extract in 7 mL water, illustrating the small amount ofsprouting after one month in storage.

FIG. 35 is a photograph of Allian potatoes not treated with mustardextract, illustrating the substantial amount of sprouting after onemonth in storage.

FIG. 36 is a photograph of a Nicotiana plant before treatment with S.alba extract, illustrating normal growth.

FIG. 37 is a photograph of the Nicotiana plant from FIG. 36 two weeksafter treatment with S. alba extract, illustrating the onset of thephytotoxic effects.

FIG. 38 is a photograph of the Nicotiana plant from FIG. 36 three weeksafter treatment with S. alba extract, illustrating the herbicidalproperties of the extract.

FIG. 39 is a photograph of a tomato plant before treatment with S. albaextract.

FIG. 40 is a photograph of the tomato plant from FIG. 39 two weeks aftertreatment with S. alba extract, showing the yellowing of some leaves,illustrating the onset of the phytotoxic effects.

FIG. 41 is a photograph of the tomato plant from FIG. 39 three weeksafter treatment with S. alba extract, illustrating the herbicidalproperties of the extract.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION I. Terms and Introduction

The following term definitions are provided to aid the reader, andshould not be considered to provide a definition different from thatknown by a person of ordinary skill in the art. And, unless otherwisenoted, technical terms are used according to conventional usage.

As used herein, the singular terms “a,” “an,” and “the” include pluralreferents unless context clearly indicates otherwise. Also, as usedherein, the term “comprises” means “includes.” Hence “comprising A or B”means including A, B, or A and B. It is further to be understood thatall nucleotide sizes or amino acid sizes, and all molecular weight ormolecular mass values, given for nucleic acids or polypeptides or othercompounds are approximate, and are provided for description. Althoughmethods and materials similar or equivalent to those described hereincan be used in the practice or testing of the present disclosure,suitable methods and materials are described below. All publications,patent applications, patents, and other references mentioned herein areincorporated by reference in their entirety. In case of conflict, thepresent specification, including explanations of terms, will control. Inaddition, the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only andnot intended to be limiting.

Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities ofcomponents, molecular weights, percentages, temperatures, times, and soforth, as used in the specification or claims are to be understood asbeing modified by the term “about.” Accordingly, unless otherwiseindicated, implicitly or explicitly, the numerical parameters set forthare approximations that may depend on the desired properties soughtand/or limits of detection under standard test conditions/methods. Whendirectly and explicitly distinguishing embodiments from discussed priorart, the embodiment numbers are not approximates unless the word “about”is recited.

In order to facilitate review of the various examples of thisdisclosure, the following explanations of specific terms are provided:

Derivative: A derivative is a molecule derived from a base structure.

Effective amount: An amount of bioactive agent that is useful forproducing a desired effect.

Plant material: A whole plant or portion(s) thereof including but notlimited to plant tissue, leaves, stems, roots, seeds, and/or flowers.

Purified: The term “purified” does not require absolute purity; rather,it is intended as a relative term. For example, a purified compound isone that is isolated in whole or in part from contaminants.

II. Biopesticide Plant Materials

The present application is primarily directed to using plant material orprocessed plant material, extracts from plant material or processedplant material, or compositions comprising the same, as biopesticides.The present disclosure is particularly directed to using extracts ofplant material from plants within the order Capparales, and the familyBrassicaceae. Even more typically, the plant material is from the generaBrassica and Sinapis, particularly Sinapis. Representative species ofBrassica include hirta, juncea and napus. Representative species ofSinapis include Sinapis alba and Sinapis arvenis. Brassica juncea andSinapis alba being currently preferred plants useful for theirbiopesticidal properties.

III. Ionic Thiocyanate Production

Another basis for determining plant material within the scope of thepresent invention is to select plant material that includesglucosinolates that produce ionic thiocyanate (SCN⁻). Thus, any plantmaterial that produces glucosinolates in a high enough concentration toproduce ionic thiocyanate in a biologically active concentration iswithin the scope of the present invention. More specifically, preferredplant material produces 4-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolate, or derivativesthereof, resulting in the production of ionic thiocyanate.

IV. Glucosinolates and Glucosinolate Concentrations

Glucosinolates, found in dicotyledonous plants, are a class of organicanions usually isolated as potassium or sodium salts, but occasionallyin other forms. For example, p-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolate is isolatedas a salt complex with sinapine, an organic cation derived from choline.Features common to the class are a β-D-thioglucose moiety, a sulfateattached through a C═N bond (sulfonated oxime), and a side group(designated R) that distinguishes one glucosinolate from another. Ageneral formula for glucosinolates is provided below.

More than 116 different R groups, and thus glucosinolates, have beenidentified or inferred from degradative products.

Glucosinolate types in plant species are highly variable. For example,the main glucosinolate in radish seed (Raphanus sativus) is4-methylsulphinyl-3-butenyl glucosinolate, while mustard seed (Brassicajuncea) is dominated by 2-propenyl glucosinolate. Cabbage seed (Brassicaoleracea) contains mainly 2-propenyl and 2-hydroxy-3-butenylglucosinolate. Rapeseed (Brassica napus) contains 4 majorglucosinolates: 2-hydroxy-3-butenyl, 3-butenyl, 4-pentenyl, and2-hydroxy-4-pentenyl. Similar differences in glucosinolate types areobserved when comparing vegetative plant parts.

Brassica and Sinapis species, and many other members of the Brassicaceaeplant family, produce glucosinolate compounds, which are secondarymetabolites. Thus, the method may also comprise determining plantspotentially useful for practicing disclosed embodiments of the presentinvention by choosing plants that produce glucosinolates in amountseffective for use as a biopesticide. Glucosinolates are compounds thatoccur in agronomically important crops and may represent a viable sourceof allelochemic control for various soil-borne plant pests.Glucosinolates can be extracted from plant material using aqueousextractions, using polar organic compounds, such as lower alkyl alcoholsas the solvent, or by using aqueous mixtures of polar organic compoundsto perform extractions, as illustrated by FIG. 1.

Glucosinolates are normally stored within plant tissues. Toxicity is notattributed to intact glucosinolates. Upon tissue damage, enzymes withinthe plant trigger their hydrolysis to several compounds includingnitriles, isothiocyanates (ITCs, —N═C═S), organic cyanides,oxazolidinethiones (OZTs), and ionic thiocyanate (SCN⁻), that arereleased upon enzymatic degradation by myrosinase (thioglucosideglucohydrolase, EC 3.2.3.1) in the presence of water as indicated belowin Scheme 1. Degradation also occurs thermally or by acid hydrolysis.Toxicity is generally attributed to these bioactive products.

Myrosinase is not properly identified as a single enzyme, but rather asa family or group of similar-acting enzymes. Multiple forms of theenzymes exist, both among species and within a single plant, and allperform a similar function. Although their genetic sequences are similarto other β-glycosidases, myrosinases are fairly specific towardglucosinolates. These enzymes cleave the sulfur-glucose bond regardlessof either the enzyme or substrate source. However, the particular enzymeand glucosinolate substrate influence reaction kinetics.

Myrosinase and glucosinolates are separated from each other in intactplant tissues. Glucosinolates are probably contained in vacuoles ofvarious types of cells. In contrast, myrosinase is contained only withinstructures, called myrosin grains, of specialized myrosin cells that aredistributed among other cells of the plant tissue. In cold-pressed meal,myrosinase and glucosinolates are no longer physically separated, andmyrosinase activity is preserved. Thus, adding water immediately resultsin the production of the hydrolysis products, including isothiocyanate,without the need for additional tissue maceration.

Nitrile character is common to four additional products. Forming anitrile (R—C≡N, also known as an organic cyanide), which does notrequire rearrangement, involves sulfur loss from the molecule. Nitrileformation is favored over ITC at low pH, but occurs in some crucifers ata pH where ITC is normally the dominant product. The presence of Fe²⁺ orthiol compounds increases the likelihood of nitrile formation anddecreases the proportion of SCN⁻ production. However, previously SCN⁻was thought to be the primary phytotoxic compound and therefore methodswere directed to maximizing its production, not decreasing it. The workdescribed herein, for example with liverwort, surprisingly indicatedthat the nitrile was much more phytotoxic than SCN⁻. Also, the 4-OHbenzyl alcohol is more phytotoxic that SCN⁻.

Epithionitrile formation requires the same conditions as for nitriles,plus terminal unsaturation of the R-group and the presence of anepithiospecifier protein. The epithiospecifier protein possesses a rareproperty in that it is an enzyme cofactor that allosterically directs anenzyme to yield a different product. Thiocyanate (R—S—C≡N) is sometimesproduced, particularly in members of the Alyssum, Coronopus, Lepidium,and Thlaspi families. Factors controlling organic thiocyanate formationare not well understood.

SCN⁻ production from glucosinolates is controlled by the presence ofspecific R-groups. Evidence suggests the anion is a resonance hybridwith greater charge on the S; however, charge can be localized on eitherthe sulfur (⁻S—C≡N) or the nitrogen (S═C═N⁻), depending on theenvironment. Indole and 4-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolates yield SCN⁻ thatis thought to arise from a highly unstable ITC intermediate. SCN⁻ isformed from indole glucosinolates over a wide pH range, whereas4-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolates is typically thought to yield SCN⁻ onlyat a more basic pH. As discussed below and in the working examples, 4-OHbenzyl isothiocyanate is not stable even at pH values of 3.0. Thehalf-life decreases with an increase in pH from 3.6 hours at pH 3.0 toless than 5 minutes at pH 7.0 (FIG. 2).

ITCs historically have been considered the ‘normal’ products ofglucosinolate breakdown. They often are volatile with pungent flavors orodors. Some of the hydrolysis products, like ITCs, exhibit biocidalproperties on insects, nematodes, fungi and/or weeds. ITC formationrequires that the initial unstable aglucon intermediate undergo aLoessen rearrangement to the R—NCS configuration. Isothiocyanates arequite reactive, although less so than the related isocyanates (R—N═C═O).A few commercially available soil fumigants depend on the activity ofmethyl ITC either as the parent compound or as produced from precursorssuch as sodium N-methyldithiocarbamate ortetrahydro-3,5-dimethyl-2H-1,3,5-thiadiazine-2-thione. Because of knowntoxicities, ITCs are often considered likely candidates for pesticidalactivity.

For Sinapis alba, the glucosinolate precursor to bioactive compounds is4-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolate. Thus, the amount of this compound foundin plants provides another basis for determining plant material usefulfor practicing embodiments of the disclosed invention. The structuralformula for 4-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolate is provided below.

A person of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that certainderivatives of 4-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolate also potentially may beuseful for practicing disclosed embodiments of the present invention.For example, naturally occurring or synthetic derivatives may includeplural hydroxyl groups, as opposed to the single hydroxyl group presentat the 4 position in 4-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolate. Such derivativesmight have a chemical formula

where one or more of R¹, R², R³ and R⁴ optionally are hydroxyl groups.It also will be appreciated that the hydroxyl groups present in4-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolate, or derivatives thereof, may be present insome other form, such as a protected form, that produces the desiredhydroxyl groups, such as by hydrolysis or enzymatic cleavage.

Moreover, halide derivatives also may be useful. As a result, one ormore of R¹, R², R³ and R⁴ optionally may be a halide. Benzylglucosinolates substituted in the meta position (3-OH benzylglucosinolate) or those with functional groups that prevent electrondelocalization (4-methoxybenzyl glucosinolate) will degrade to morestable isothiocyanates. The stability of the isothiocyanate may beimportant for the use of seed meal products in pest control given thedifferences in biological activities of the glucosinolate hydrolysisproducts.

The concentrations of 4-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolate in plant materialcorrespond to the amounts of ionic thiocyanate (SCN⁻) produced by suchmaterials. A standardized methodology is used to quantitativelydetermine amounts of such bioactive compounds. This is the subject ofGuidelines for Glucosinolate Analysis in Green Tissues forBiofumigation, Agroindustria, Vol. 3, No. 3 (2004), which isincorporated herein by reference. This publication discussesmodifications of the ISO 9167-1 method, initially set up for evaluatingrapeseed seeds, with the objective of optimizing and standardizingglucosinolate analysis in fresh tissues (leaves, roots or stems) ofBrassicaceae. Collection, storage and preparation of fresh samplessuitable to be analyzed are important steps during which it is necessaryto avoid glucosinolate hydrolysis by the endogenous myrosinase-catalyzedreaction. Differences in glucosinolate concentrations in stored,processed and fresh meal are illustrated by FIG. 3.

For disclosed embodiments of the present disclosure, 4-hydroxybenzylglucosinolate concentrations were determined using HPLC/MS. Additionalinformation concerning determining glucosinolate concentrations isprovided below in the working examples, using an internal standard, suchas 4-methoxy benzyl glucosinolate. In summary, the concentration of the4-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolate is measured, such as by determining thearea under the appropriate HPLC peak. The concentration is multiplied bya response factor of 0.5 relative to 2-propenyl glucosinolate todetermine the concentration of 4-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolate.

Certain disclosed embodiments concern plant material having effectiveamounts of 4-hyroxybenzyl glucosinolate. The glucosinolate concentrationtypically is determined after plant material has been cold pressed toremove a majority of the plant oil. Residual oil contents for coldpressed plants typically range from substantially 0% to about 15%, moretypically from 7% to 12%. If solvent extraction is used for oil removal,oil contents may be less than 1%. Glucosinolate concentrations may varywithin plants of a single species, and concentration fluctuations mayoccur within a particular plant. Additional environmental factors suchas spacing, moisture regime, and nutrient availability also may affectconcentration. Nevertheless, useful 4-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolateamounts are from about 10 μmol/gram to about 500 μmol/gram, typicallyfrom about 10 μmol/gram to about 400 μmol/gram, more typically fromabout 50 μmol/gram to about 250 μmol/gram, and even more typically fromabout 75 μmol/gram to about 210 μmol/gram. Concentrations within thesestated ranges have proved useful for controlling and/or suppressing weedformation in plant growth studies. FIG. 4 is an image illustrating theeffects of Sinapis alba for weed production beside a control in agreenhouse trial.

V. Seed Meal

Portions of plant material, leaves, stems, roots and seeds that have thehighest concentration of glucosinolate commonly are used to practiceembodiments of the disclosed process. Meal is preferably made fromseeds; however it is possible to use any plant material containingglucosinolate to make the meal. For example, with reference to theexemplary Sinapis alba plant material, it has been found that the seedscontain the highest levels of 4-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolate. Sinapisalba is useful for making biodiesel. In a working embodiment, biodieselproduction crushes the seeds, to liberate the oil, leaving the seed mealas a by-product. This by-product had limited use prior to development ofthe present invention. The seed meal now can be used to practiceembodiments of the presently disclosed process.

VI. Extraction

In some embodiments, glucosinolates are extracted from the plantmaterial or processed plant material, such as seed meal produced by theproduction of biodiesel. Extracting glucosolinolates from the plantmaterial or processed plant material has several advantages. It cansignificantly reduce the effects of batch-to-batch variability resultingfrom variability in plant growing conditions, processing and storage.Also, the cost and logistics of transportation, storage, and applicationof mustard meal are relatively high compared to extracts of the same.And the introduction of large amounts of meal to the soil may result ina large organic carbon load (mustard contains up to 80% of organiccarbon by weight), which can create some adverse effects such as growthof undesirable microorganisms.

Additionally, the extracts are typically stable in storage for at leastthree months at 25° C., and up to a year or more at −4° C. The extractsare typically not light sensitive, are thermally stable up to 120° C.,and do not promote mold growth. In some embodiments, the extracts mayhave at least twice the concentration of active ingredients as mustardmeal, such as up to three times, up to four times, or more than fourtimes the concentration. The extracts can be prepared either as apowder, or as a solution in variety of active agent concentrations asrequired for different applications. The use of such solutions makes theextracts compatible with spray delivery systems.

The plant material or processed plant material is extracted using asolvent system suitable for extracting glucosinolates from the plantmaterial. The solvent system used for the extraction may be a singlesolvent or mixture of solvents. Typically, an aqueous solvent system isused for the extraction, such as a solvent system comprising water andalkyl alcohol. The alkyl alcohols may comprise one or more C₁-C₄ alkylalcohols, such as methanol, ethanol, propanol, isopropanol, n-butanol,isobutanol, sec-butanol or tert-butanol. In some embodiments, a singlealcohol is used, but in other embodiments, two or more alcohols areused, such as a mixture of methanol and ethanol.

The solvent system may comprise from greater than 0% to 100% water andfrom less than 100% to 0% alcohol, such as from 10% to 90% water andfrom 90% to 10% alcohol, or from 30% to 70% water and from 70% to 30%alcohol. In some embodiments, a ratio of water to alcohol is selected toinhibit or substantially prevent the glucosinolates from hydrolyzingduring the extraction. In such embodiments, the percentage of alcohol inthe solvent system is from 60% to less than 100%, such as from 65% to95% or from 70% to 90%. In certain embodiments, seed meal, such as B.juncea seed meal, is extracted with an extraction solvent comprising,consisting essentially of, or consisting of from 60% to less than 100%alcohol and from greater than zero to 40% water, such as from 60% to 90%alcohol and from 10% to 40% water, from 60% to 80% alcohol and from 20%to 40% water, or from 65% to 75% alcohol and from 25% to 35% water, andin particular embodiments, the seed meal is extracted with an extractionsolvent comprising, consisting essentially of, or consisting of about70% alcohol and 30% water. In certain embodiments, the alcohol isethanol.

Alternatively, the ratio of water to alcohol may be selected to promotehydrolysis of the glucosinolates during the extraction. In suchembodiments, the solvent system typically comprises an excess of water.The solvent system may comprise from 60% to 100% water and from 40% to0% alcohol, such as from 70% to 90% water and from 30% to 10% alcohol.The extraction process may continue for a time period suitable to allowhydrolysis of the glucosinolates. In some embodiments, the extraction isperformed for up to 5 days, such as up to 3 days, or from 2 to 3 days,to allow for extraction and hydrolysis to take place.

The water may comprise a buffer, to maintain the pH at a level suitablefor hydrolysis of the glucosinolates. In some embodiments, the bufferwas selected to maintain a pH of from 6 to 7.2 during the extraction. Insome embodiments, twice as much buffer was required for the extractionof S. alba as was required from B. juncea, such as twice theconcentration of buffer. Examples of suitable buffers include, but arenot limited to, phosphate, carbonate, bicarbonate buffers orcombinations thereof. In particular embodiments, sodium bicarbonate isused as the buffer.

The extracts may be filtered to remove any solid material, and thenevaporated by any suitable technique known to a person of ordinary skillin the art, to remove the extraction solvent(s). Suitable techniquesinclude, but are not limited to, rotary evaporation, optionally undervacuum, spray drying, belt drying, drum drying, freeze drying or anycombination thereof. In certain embodiments, spray drying is preferred.Typically, the evaporation and/or drying will produce a solid extract,which may be in the form of a powder, such as a free-flowing powder.

Glucosinolates themselves are not biologically active and can bepreserved in extracts for prolong amount of time. However, in thepresence of water, they are converted by the endogenous enzymemyrosinase (thioglucoside glucohydrolase, EC 3.2.1.147) intobiologically active compounds. The major glucosinolate in S. alba,sinalbin, is hydrolyzed to an unstable isothiocyanate thatnon-enzymatically produces SCN⁻, a phytotoxic compound (Scheme 2). Themajor glucosinolate in B. juncea, sinigrin, is hydrolyzed to produce avolatile, bioactive 2-propenyl isothiocyanate.

Myrosinase is present in mustard meal, such as S. alba and B. junceameal. Thus, mustard meal may be added to an aqueous solution ofglucosinolates to aid hydrolysis. The aqueous solution also may comprisea buffer, such as a phosphate buffer, carbonate buffer, bicarbonatebuffer, or a combination thereof, to maintain a pH preferable for theactivity of the enzyme. In some embodiments, the pH is from about 5 toabout 8, such as from 6 to 7.5. Mustard meal can swell up in aqueoussolution, by up to about 400%. Therefore, the amount of mustard mealadded to the aqueous solution typically does not exceed 20% by weight,to allow for recovery of the liquid. In some embodiments, the amount ofmustard meal is further limited to allow for reasonable recovery of thedesired products, and may be 10% or less by weight, such as 7% or lessor 4% or less.

Hydrolysis of mustard extract can be performed prior to the applicationto the field. For example, an extract from S. alba containing sinalbincan be hydrolyzed to yield a stable ionic thiocyanate solution. Thissolution can be applied through the existing sprinkler or sprayersystems for control of weeds. Alternatively, hydrolysis of mustardextract can be performed in situ, when mustard extract is applied to thefield and then hydrolyzed directly at the point of pest control. Thisapproach is particularly useful for pest and nematode control by thevolatile, allyl isothiocyanate hydrolysis product of sinigrin from B.juncea.

VII. Compositions

The plant material or processed plant material, or extracts thereof maybe used as prepared or extracted, or they may be formulated with othermaterials to facilitate their bioactive properties. The material orextracts may be formulated as a solution to aid delivery by sprinklersystems or spraying devices. Also, myrosinase may be added to aidhydrolysis of the glusocinolates to the isothiocyanates. Compositionsmay also include a buffer, such as a phosphate buffer, to aidmaintaining an effective pH, for example, to facilitate effectivemyrosinase activity.

The material or extracts may be formulated into a solid form, such as apellet, capsule, granule or powder. The solid formulation may alsocomprise one or more enzymes to aid hydrolysis, such as Myrosinase,and/or a buffer, such as a phosphate buffer. The advantages of storingextracts as a solid compared to storing allyl isothiocyanate itselfinclude increased worker safely and decreased danger resulting fromstoring a gaseous, highly toxic compound. The allyl isothiocyanate thencan be produced when needed, by contacting the solid-formulated extractwith water. The advantage as compared to using an allyl isothiocyanateitself is increased worker safety, as the pesticide is produced onlywhen needed. As long as the extract is kept dry, possible human exposureis minimized. The pellet or capsule will contain the extract, buffer,and enzyme. This has important safety implications with respect to usingthe extracts as sprout inhibitors or as pesticides applied to soils orthe environment.

Furthermore, the extracts of plant products prepared according to thepresent disclosure also can be formulated with other materials tofacilitate useful fumigant attributes, or to facilitate other processes,such as fertilization processes. SCN⁻ often works synergistically withother chemicals. For example, use with certain peroxides producesbactericidal solutions, although neither is effective alone. Similarly,SCN⁻ was more efficient in lysing cells when combined with other anionsor lysozymes than when any agent was used alone at the sameconcentrations.

Thus, the plant material or processed plant material or extractsthereof, and/or compositions thereof disclosed herein can be combinedwith other materials, natural and/or synthetic, inert and/or active, toproduce useful fertilizing and/or fumigant compositions. A partial listof such materials include inert materials, such as binders, colorants,and/or pH adjusters/stabilizers; active compounds, such as naturallyderived pesticide materials including capsaicin, onions, Neem treematerials, or compositions derived therefrom, such as Bacillusthuringiensis, microorganisms such as pseudomonads, peroxides, syntheticherbicides, surfactants and combinations thereof.

Furthermore, plant material or processed plant material or extractsthereof or compositions thereof disclosed herein also can be formulatedwith other materials to provide essential plant nutrients, such asphosphorus. With respect to nitrogen, the seed meal of Sinapis alba, forexample, provides high concentrations of nitrogen (5-6% on a weightbasis), and hence added nitrogen is not required.

VIII. Methods for Using

Once the disclosed extracts or compositions are obtained, they are thenapplied as needed and desired to take advantage of their biopesticidalproperties. For example, extracts of plant material or processed plantmaterial, or compositions thereof, can be applied as surfaceapplications, such as bare soil prior to planting. As used herein,“surface application” refers to applications that penetrate only the topportion of a soil, such as about 0.1 inch (about 0.25 centimeter) of thesoil.

Additionally, an extract of plant material or processed plant material,or compositions thereof, may be applied directly on to a weed or thesoil adjacent to the weed. The soil adjacent to the weed may be of fromimmediately next to the weed to a suitable distance from the weed suchthat application of the extract substantially inhibits growth of theweed or kills the weed. In particular embodiments, the extract isapplied directly to the weed by a suitable technique, such as spraying.The extract may be added to water to form a solution, suspension oremulsion suitable for spraying. The extract may comprise one or morehydrolysis products before application. Alternatively, the extract maycomprise glucosinolate and be mixed with myrosinase or amyrosinase-containing composition such as mustard meal, typically in abuffered aqueous media, at the time of application, or immediatelybefore. This helps prevent volatile isothiocyanates such as allylisothiocyanate, from substantially evaporating in storage prior to use.In an alternative embodiment, a solution of extract comprising theglucosinolates and a composition may be applied sequentially in anyorder, or substantially at the same time, thereby allowing theisothiocyanates to form in situ as the glucosinolates and myrosinase mixon the plant or in the soil.

Certain food crops are resistant to active compounds provided by theextracts of plant material or processed plant material. As a result, themethod also can include applying such extracts at the same time as foodcrops are planted. Alternatively, the method can include applying suchextracts after emergence of food crops. For example, carrot seeds inboth pelleted and un-pelleted form germinate in the presence of anextract of Sinapis alba meal when provided at concentrations sufficientto kill or significantly damage weeds, such as those specificallyidentified in this application. Carrots appear more “tolerant” to theSCN⁻ produced by S. alba meal as compared to such crops as lettuce.

Additionally, the growth of sprouts in vegetables can be inhibited orsubstantially prevented during storage of harvested vegetables, by theusing seed meal or an extract of plant material or processed plantmaterial, such as the seed meal. In some embodiments, vegetablesprouting is controlled, such as inhibited to substantially prevented,by using Brassica juncea seed meal or extract or a combination thereof.Vegetables suitable for use in the disclosed method include anyvegetable that may sprout during storage. The sprouting vegetable may bea bulb vegetable, such as onion, garlic, shallot, or chive; a cormvegetable, such as taro, water chestnut, or eddoe; or a tuber vegetable,such as a stem or root tuber vegetable. Exemplary stem tuber vegetablesinclude, but are not limited to, potatoes, Jerusalem artichokes, oryams, such as Chinese yams, purple yams, white yams, and winged yams.Exemplary root tuber vegetables include, but are not limited to, cassavaor dahlia.

In some embodiments, the growth of sprouts in vegetables, for example,in potatoes, can be inhibited or substantially prevented during storageof harvested vegetables, by the using seed meal or an extract of plantmaterial or processed plant material, such as the seed meal. In someembodiments, vegetable sprouting, such as potato sprouting, iscontrolled, such as inhibited to substantially prevented, by usingBrassica juncea seed meal or extract or a combination thereof. Suitablepotatoes include any potato such as, for example, Russet Burbank, RussetNorkotah, Western Russet, Cal Red, Red La Soda, Norland, FrenchFingerling, Russian Banana, Purple Peruvian, Yukon Gold, Yukon Gem, RubyCresent, Yellow Finn, Huckleberry, Ida Rose, Klondike Golddust, KlondikeRose, Milva, Ranger Russet, All Blue, Alturas Russet, Bannock Russet,Bintje, Blazer Russet, Classic Russet, Clearwater Russet, Onaway, Elba,Carola, Oliense, Cecil, Allian, Agata, Russet Alpine, Rosara, Chieftan,Dark Red Norland, Red Norland, Innovator, Shepody, California Whites, ora combination thereof. The seed meal or extract may be prepared as anaqueous composition, such as an aqueous solution, suspension oremulsion. In some embodiments, vegetable sprouting, such as potatosprouting, is controlled, such as inhibited or substantially prevented,by exposing the vegetables to products formed by forming thecomposition. The products may be volatile products. In some embodiments,the products comprise an ITC. Control of potato sprouting by theproducts is unexpected because thiocyanate compounds, that have a —SCNmoiety, such as sodium thiocyanate (NaSCN), potassium thiocyanate (KSCN)or ammonium thiocyanate (NH₄SCN), have been shown to promote potatosprouting. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 1,875,473, and Florida StateHorticultural Society Proceedings, 1945, vol. 58, pages 236-237.

The vegetables, such as potatoes, may be exposed to the products by anysuitable technique, such as spraying, fogging the atmosphere, and/orexposing in a container or room, such as a sealed container or room. Insome embodiments, the aqueous composition is formed, such as bycontacting the seed meal or extract with water, in the presence of thevegetables. For example, FIG. 5 shows two photographs of potatoes insealed containers. One potato is exposed to B. juncea seed meal andwater; the other is a control. After three weeks at 25° C. and a diurnallight cycle, the control potato has produced sprouts, whereas the seedmeal-treated potato has not.

The concentration of extract or seed meal, such as B. juncea seed mealor extract thereof, in a solution, suspension, or emulsion is selectedto effectively prevent sprout growth on the vegetables, such aspotatoes. In some embodiments, the amount of solvent, such as water,that is used per gram of extract or seed meal is from greater than zeroto 50 mL or more, such as from 1 mL to 30 mL, from 2 mL to 25 mL, from 3mL to 20 mL, from 4 mL to 15 mL, or from 5 mL to 10 mL, and in certaindisclosed embodiments, 7 mL, 14 mL or 28 mL of solvent was used per gramof extract or seed meal. The vegetables may be exposed once to thecomposition and/or the products formed by forming the composition, orthey may be repeatedly exposed, as necessary, to prevent sprout growth.For repeated applications, a time period between applications isselected such that inhibition of vegetable sprout growth, such as potatosprout growth, is maintained, such as from greater than zero days to 12weeks or more, from 1 week to 10 weeks, from 2 weeks to 8 weeks, or from4 weeks to 8 weeks. The amount of seed meal, or extract thereof, used tocontrol the vegetable sprouting, such as potato sprouting, is one gramfor from greater than zero to 500 pounds or more of the vegetables, suchas from 1 pound to 400 pounds, from 2 pounds to 300 pounds, from 3pounds to 250 pounds, or from 4 pounds to 200 pounds per gram of extractor seed meal. In other embodiments, the seed meal or extract thereof, isused in an amount of one gram for every 500 pounds or fraction thereofof the vegetables, for example, potatoes, such as one gram for every 400pounds or fraction thereof, one gram for every 300 pounds or fractionthereof, one gram for every 250 pounds or fraction thereof, or one gramfor every 200 pounds or fraction thereof of the vegetables.Alternatively, the amount of seed meal or extract, such as Brassicajuncea seed meal or extract or a combination thereof, may be up to onegram per 225 kg or more of the vegetables, such as potatoes, such asfrom one gram per 1 kg of vegetables to one gram per 100 kg ofvegetables, or from one gram per 1.5 kg of vegetables to one gram per 50kg of vegetables.

The extract or seed meal may comprise an amount of sinigrin sufficientsuch that upon forming an aqueous composition, a sufficient amount ofhydrolysis products are formed to inhibit and/or substantially preventvegetable, such as potato, sprouting. The amount of sinigrin in theextract or seed meal may be from greater than zero to 2,000 μmol or moreper gram of extract, such as from 100 μmol/g to 1,750 μmol/g, from 200μmol/g to 1,500 μmol/g, from 300 μmol/g to 1,250 μmol/g, or from 350μmol/g to 1,000 μmol/g of extract or seed meal.

On a large scale, vegetable storage sheds, such as potato storage sheds,can be fumigated with the volatile products formed by forming an aqueouscomposition of Brassica juncea seed meal or extract or a combinationthereof. The volatile products may comprise 2-propenyl isothiocyanate.The vegetable storage sheds can be fumigated by any suitable technique,such as by spraying or fogging the atmosphere of the storage facility.Using a volatile compound can be a benefit. For example, the volatile2-propenyl isothiocyanate will substantially evaporate from thevegetables before they are consumed by people. A low residual amount ofthe isothiocyanate remaining on the vegetables is unlikely to be toxic.The chemical responsible for the sharp taste of horseradish is2-propenyl isothiocyanate, the same active ingredient in mustard. At lowconcentrations, isothiocyanates are considered anticarcinogenic, and2-propenyl isothiocyanate is registered with EPA as a biopesticide.

IX. Pest Control

Embodiments of the present disclosure can be used to control a varietyof pests, such as weeds, fungi, bacteria, yeasts, insects, such asfungus gnats, weevils, flies, and nematodes, and combinations of suchpests. For example, disclosed embodiments, such as by using meal and/orextracts from various plant material, including Sinapis alba or Brassicajuncea, have been used in certain embodiments to control a variety ofweeds (FIGS. 4 and 6). Solely by way of example, and without limitation,a list of weeds that have been controlled using embodiments of thepresent invention include prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola), mayweedchamomile (Anthemis cotula), common lambsquarters (Chenopodium album),wild oat (Avena fatua), redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus),liverwort and combinations thereof. It is very likely that additionalweeds will be controlled, and studies are ongoing to fully elucidate thebiopesticidal scope of disclosed embodiments.

For examples, the efficiency of the extract when used for liverwortcontrol is comparable to commercial pesticides and provides a renewableand organic alternative (FIG. 7). For liverwort control, it was foundthat extracting S. alba using an extraction solvent comprising 30%ethanol and 70% water was advantageous. The liverwort was sprayed withthe S. alba extracts until at least the upward-facing leaf surfaces werecovered, but dripping from the leaves did not occur. By analyzing theextract by HPLC/TOF MS/UV chromatography, it was surprisingly found thatthe extract comprised 4-hydroxyphenyl acetonitrile and 4-hydroxybenzylalcohol (FIGS. 8-10), and that there was very little, if any SCN⁻present. The sinalbin had been hydrolyzed to undetectable levels.However, application of either of these two compounds alone did notcontrol the liverwort as effectively as applying the extract (FIGS. 11and 12). Additionally, in apparent contrast to previous reports, the4-hydroxyphenyl acetonitrile and 4-hydroxybenzyl alcohol are the primaryphytotoxic compounds, rather than the SCN⁻. SCN⁻ appeared to be a minorcontributor to the overall phytotoxicity of the extract.

X. EXAMPLES Example 1

Hydrolysis solution composition, time, and amount of mustard meal as asource of myrosinase were varied to determine the maximum production ofallyl isothiocyanate and ionic thiocyanate from sinigrin, and sinalbin,respectively.

A. Materials and Methods

1. Materials

Mustard seeds of S. alba (IdaGold variety) and B. juncea (PacifiGold)were obtained locally. Oil contents of seeds and meals were analyzedgravimetrically after extraction with hexane. A sinigrin standard andallyl isothiocyanate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, Mo.,USA). Standard of sinalbin was isolated from S. alba in our laboratory.Acetonitrile, water, methanol, and other solvents were of HPLC or LC/MSgrade. Solvents and all other chemicals (at least of analytical grade)were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich or ThermoFisher (Pittsburgh, Pa.,USA).

2. Mustard Meal Crude Extract Preparation

Mustard meal was homogenized and ground to a fine powder. Seed meal wasextracted with 73% (v/v) methanol at 1:20 v/v ratio using an end-to-endshaker at room temperature for 2 hours. Seed debris was separated byfiltering, and filtrates were concentrated by rotary evaporation toremove most of the solvent. Concentrated extract was then freeze-driedto obtain a free flowing powder. The concentration of sinalbin in S.alba mustard extract was 777 μmole g⁻¹ extract and the concentration ofsinigrin in B. juncea mustard extract was 555 μmole g⁻¹ extract.

3. Hydrolysis of Mustard Meal Crude Extract

Hydrolysis of mustard extracts was performed by adding correspondingmustard meal to mustard meal extract powder and then letting ithydrolyze in aqueous solution. Hydrolysis optimization was performedusing 0.1 g of mustard meal with 0.05-0.3 of extract in 2.5 mL ofaqueous solution. Hydrolysis media was modified with buffers atdifferent pH and concentrations. Time of hydrolysis was optimized from30 minutes to 48 hours under static conditions at room temperature.

4. Derivatization of Allyl Isothiocyanate

An aliquot (10-100 μL) of the hydrolysis mixture was diluted withmethanol to 5 mL. Diluted solution (860 μL) was added to 2-mL autosamplevial containing 860 μL of 100 mM potassium phosphate at pH 8.5. Then 280μL of 35 mM 1,2-benzenedithiol/1% mercaptoethanol in methanol was added,the vial was capped and incubated for 1 hour at 65° C. After incubation,mixture was vortexed, centrifuged at 24000 rpm and analyzed by HPLC/UV.

5. HPLC/UV Analysis of Derivatized Allyl Isothiocyanate

Analysis of derivatized allyl isothiocyanate was performed using anAgilent 1200 Series HPLC system with a diode array detection (DAD)system on Agilent XDB C18 (1.8 μm, 4.6×50 mm) column (Agilent, SantaClara, Calif., USA). Column was thermostated at 30° C. Isocratic elutionwas used with 90% acetonitrile in water. Flow rate was 0.6 mL/min.Spectra were recorded from 190 to 400 nm with 2 nm step. Injectionvolume was 5 μL. The runtime was 5 minutes with a derivatized allylisothiocyanate elution time of 1.4 minutes. Derivatized allylisothiocyanate was quantified at extracted wavelength channel of 350-360nm. An external calibration curve was used for quantification.

6. Ion Chromatographic Analysis

Sinigrin, sinalbin, sulfate, and ionic thiocyanate in extracts werequantified by ion chromatography (IC). IC analysis was performed using aDionex Ion Analyzer equipped with a GP40 gradient pump, ED40electrochemical detector, and an AS40 autosampler. Dionex 4×210 mmIon-Pac AS16 anion exchange column was used for separation. Sodiumhydroxide (100 mM) was used as the mobile phase at flow rate of 0.9mL/min. The detector stabilizer temperature was set at 30° C. withtemperature compensation of 1.7% per ° C. Anion suppressor current wasset to 300 mA. The injection volume was 20 μL.

7. Data Analysis

All experiments were performed at least in triplicate and are presentedas means±one standard deviation. Significant differences among analyteconcentrations detected by different methods of analysis were determinedusing one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a p<0.05 level ofsignificance. All analyses were performed using AV software (version 10,SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C., USA).

B. Results and Discussions

1. Optimization of Hydrolysis pH and Buffering System

During sinalbin and sinigrin enzymatic hydrolysis, several hydrolysisproducts are released (Scheme 2). Sinigrin is hydrolyzed to equimolaramounts of allyl isothiocyanate, sulfate, glucose, and hydronium ion.Hydrolysis of sinalbin leads to equimolar amounts of 4-hydroxybenzylalcohol, ionic thiocyanate, sulfate, glucose, and two moles of hydroniumion. The hydrolysis reaction is catalyzed by myrosinase enzyme, which isnaturally present in mustard. To aid hydrolysis of mustard extracts,mustard meal was added as a source of myrosinase to the hydrolysismixture. Mustard meal has relatively high mucilage content and can swellup to 400% in aqueous media. Thus the amount of meal added forhydrolysis of mustard extracts cannot exceed 20% by weight to allow forrecovery of liquid and should not exceed 4% to allow for reasonablerecovery of glucosinolates. When 0.1 g of mustard meal is added to 0.15g of mustard extracts reconstituted in 2.5 mL of water, more than 84% ofsolution can be recovered after mustard meal swelling. If higherrecoveries of glucosinolates are desired in the liquid phase, morediluted solutions of mustard extracts can be used.

For hydrolysis of endogenous glucosinolates the buffering capacity ofmustard meal is sufficient to maintain pH even when endogenousglucosinolates are hydrolyzed in the presence of water and hydronium ionis released. However, unlike endogenous concentrations in mustard meal,concentration of glucosinolates in mustard extracts are significantlyhigher. The excess of glucosinolates relative to the meal leads to thechange in pH that exceeds buffering capacity of the meal. Myrosinase hasmaximum of activity at pH of 5-7, while its activity is almostnegligible at low pH. Indeed, when the amount of mustard extract wasincreased relative to the meal, the incomplete hydrolysis was observedwith the increase of the total glucosinolate amount (FIGS. 13 and 14).Despite the increase of sinalbin extract added to the reaction mixture,the maximum concentration of SCN⁻ produced was leveled out at 24 mM,which is about five times higher concentration that could be producedfrom the original mustard meal. For sinigrin, a similar trend wasobserved. The maximum concentration of allyl isothiacyanate produced was14 mM even when up to 42 mM of sinigrin was added to the meal in theform of a mustard extract.

The incomplete hydrolysis of glucosinolates in mustard extracts is dueto the decrease of reaction mixture pH (FIGS. 13 and 14). Uponhydrolysis of endogenous sinalbin, pH typically decreases by one unitfrom 5.8 to 4.6, at which myrosinase activity is still adequate.However, when mustard extracts are added to the meal, more thanthree-fold increase of the sinalbin concentrations resulted in pHdecrease to one more unit pH. Sinalbin concentrations four times higherthan the endogenous concentrations resulted in the pH of 2.5 and themyrosinase inactivation. Similarly, pH of sinigrin hydrolysis mixture isdecrease to 4.6.

To prevent inactivation of myrosinase by increased acidity, a series ofphosphate buffers in the pH range from 6.0 to 7.5 was used instead ofwater for glucosinolate hydrolysis (FIG. 15). When 200 mM phosphatebuffer was used, complete hydrolysis of sinigrin and sinalbin wasobserved in pH range from 6.0 to 7.2, while some of glucosinolates werestill unhydrolyzed when pH was increased to 7.5. The minimumconcentration of phosphate buffer required for maintaining pH wasinvestigated and accounted for 1.5-2 times of the expected concentrationof glucosinolates in the extracts.

Other buffering agents (carbonate and bicarbonate) at the sameconcentration were equally efficient in maintaining hydrolysis mixturepH at 6.5 and providing complete hydrolysis of sinalbin and sinigrin.The use of carbonate for pH adjustment allows for the development of theglucosinolate extract pesticide which can be certified as organic andmay make the final product less expensive.

2. Optimization of Hydrolysis Media Composition

To achieve quantitative conversion of intact glucosinolates to theirbiologically active products, hydrolysis media composition was furtheroptimized. In the presence of buffer with mustard meal as a myrosinasesource, sinigrin and sinalbin are completely hydrolyzed, however only90% of corresponding biologically active hydrolysis products areproduced.

When ascorbic acid was added to the reaction mixture, almostquantitative release of allyl isothiocyanate and ionic thiocyanate wasobserved. Ascorbic acid acts as a co-factor for myrosinase and it isnaturally present in mustard meal. However, with high glucosinolateconcentrations present in mustard extracts, additional amounts ofascorbic acid are needed. Particularly, when 0.1-50 mM of ascorbic acidwas added to the hydrolysis solution, all of sinalbin was converted toSCN⁻, and all sinigrin was converted to allyl isothiocyanate (FIG. 16).With respect to FIG. 16, the mass balance closure represents thepercentage of glucosinolate converted to the biologically active allylisothiocyanate and ionic thiocyanate on a molar basis.

While it may be advantageous to maintain pH and ascorbic acid content inthe hydrolysis mixture, it is also useful to carefully select mustardmeal that will be used a source of myrosinase to assure high myrosinaseactivity. Mustard meal is typically obtained by cold pressing mustardseed for oil. During the pressing process, some of the myrosinase can bedeactivated due to the local heat in the press. In fact, it has beenestimated that myrosinase activity in some processed meals may be aslittle as less than 0.5% of the activity found in the unprocessed seed.Cold pressing and defatting with hexane to remove mustard oil does notaffect the concentrations of glucosinolates, but affect the activity ofmyrosinase. Growth, harvest, and storage conditions can also affect theactivity of the myrosinase. As a result, the amount of glucosinolateshydrolyzed is lower.

3. Optimization of Hydrolysis Time

The glucosinolate-myrosinase system is designed in such a way that theincrease of water content in the plant coupled with the seed tissuerupture lead to the immediate hydrolysis reaction. Without being boundto a particular theory, the release of hydrolysis products may be adefense mechanism of mustard plants. When mustard extract is hydrolyzedunder static conditions, it can take a substantial period of time forcomplete hydrolysis of glucosinolates, due to the significant higherconcentrations of glucosinolates.

Using phosphate and bicarbonate as buffering agent at finalconcentration of 150 mM, complete hydrolysis of sinalbin and sinigrinwas observed in 24 hours (FIG. 17). Phosphate buffer allows for fasterhydrolysis and all glucosinolates can be hydrolyzed under staticcondition in just 12 hours. Original pH of phosphate buffer is 6.5 andit coincides with the optimum pH for myrosinase. When potassiumbicarbonate was used for maintaining pH, original pH was 9.5 and thenreduces to 6.5 over the time as hydronium ions were released fromglucosinolates. Since myrosinase activity at pH 9.5 is lower than thatat pH 6.5, initial hydrolysis reaction rates were slower as compared tothe phosphate buffered systems. When no buffering agent was used,hydrolysis rates were generally slower and incomplete hydrolysis wasobserved even after reaction time of 36 hours.

Faster release of biologically active compounds can shorten bioherbicidepreparation time. However, slower release of biologically activecompounds may be beneficial for better control of pests. For example,when sinigrin is hydrolyzed, fast release of allyl isothiocyanate mayresult in undesired loss of volatile allyl isothiocyanate. At the sametime, if allyl isothiocyanate is released slowly over the time, allylisothiocyanate has better changes to interact with potential pest andultimately lead to the more efficient pest control.

Example 2

This example provides detail concerning seed meal preparation,determination of glucosinolate concentrations in defatted meal, releaseof 4-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolate from meal, and ionic thiocyanateproduction from 4-OH benzyl isothiocyanate.

All analyses and experiments were performed with meal remaining afterseed from the S. alba cultivar IdaGold was cold pressed to removeapproximately 90% of the oil. The remaining oil was removed byperforming three extractions with petroleum ether that involved shaking500 grams of the meal with 500 milliliters of petroleum ether andfiltering through a Büchner funnel. The final filtration cake was washedwith 250 milliliters of petroleum ether, allowed to air dry, andhomogenized in a blender.

Sinalbin Content of the Meal.

The glucosinolate concentration of the defatted meal was determinedusing a method similar to that of the International Organization ofStandardization. Defatted seed meal was weighed (200 mg) into 15-mLextraction tubes to which 500 mg of 3-mm glass beads, 10 milliliters of70% methanol/water solution, and 100 of internal standard(4-methoxybenzyl glucosinolate, obtained from meadowfoam (Limnanthesalba) seed meal) were added. The detector response factor for4-methoxybenzyl glucosinolate was determined by comparison with knownconcentrations of 2-propenyl glucosinolate having an assumed responsefactor of 1.0. Extraction tubes were shaken for 2 hours on a reciprocalshaker and centrifuged for 5 min at 1073 g to precipitate the seed meal.The extract solution was transferred to columns containing 250 mg ofDEAE anion exchanger and allowed to drain freely. The columns werewashed twice with 1 milliliter of deionized water and finally with 1milliliter of 0.1 M ammonium acetate buffer (pH 4.0). To the columns wasthen added 100 of a 1 mg/L sulfatase enzyme (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis,Mo.) solution and 100 μL of 0.1 M ammonium acetate buffer (pH 4.0). Thecolumns were covered to prevent evaporation and allowed to stand withthe enzyme for 12 hours, after which time the samples were eluted intoHPLC autosampler vials with two consecutive 750-4, volumes of deionizedwater.

A Waters 2695 HPLC separation module coupled with a Waters 996photodiode array detector (PDA) and Thermabeam Mass Detector (TMD) wasused for glucosinolate analysis. For quantitative purposes alldesulfoglucosinolates detected by PDA were measured at a wavelength of229 nanometers. Separation was performed on a 250×2.00 mm, 5μ, 125 ÅAqua C18 column (Phenomenex, Torrance, Calif.). The flow rate was 200μL/min, with a methanol gradient starting at 0.5% and increasing to 50%.Glucosinolates were identified using a combination of expected retentionbehavior (time, sequence) and mass spectra.

4-Hydroxybenzyl Isothiocyanate Release from S. alba Seed Meal.

Ten grams of the defatted meal were weighed into polypropylenecentrifuge tubes to which was added 40 mL of deionized water. In one setof triplicate samples we added 10 milliliters of ethyl acetate as theextractant and 1 μL of decane (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo.) as theinternal standard immediately after mixing the meal with deionizedwater. The mixtures were shaken, maintained at 22±2° C., and samplesremoved periodically during a 96-hour incubation period. In a second setof triplicate samples, the addition of 10 milliliters of ethyl acetateand 1 μL of decane were delayed until 30 minutes prior to eachrespective sampling time. At each sampling time the mixture wascentrifuged for 10 minutes at 1677 g and 250 μL of the supernatant waswithdrawn for analysis. GC-MS analysis was performed using an HP 5890Agas chromatograph equipped with a 30 m×0.32 mm i.d., 0.25 μm film HP-5MScapillary column (Agilent Technologies) coupled to an HP 5972 massdetector. Ethyl acetate extracts were manually injected into asplit/splitless port (250° C., 20 s split) and temperature of the GCoven was programmed from 65° C. (isocratic 3 minutes) to 270° C.(isocratic 5 minutes) at a rate of 15° C./minute. Average linear flowrate of helium at 250° C. was 35 centimeters/minute. Data (total ioncurrent) were corrected using decane as the internal standard andquantified using benzyl isothiocyanate as an external standard.

Extraction efficiencies for 2-propenyl, butyl, benzyl, and t-octylisothiocyanates were determined by combining 10 μL of each in duplicate40-milliliters deionized water samples. The samples were treated in thesame manner as described above including both the immediate and delayedaddition of ethyl acetate and decane. The amount of each analyteextracted using continuous or periodic extraction was determined usingGC-MS as described for S. alba seed meal.

Stability of 4-Hydroxybenzyl Isothiocyanate in Buffered Media.

Partially purified 4-hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanate was prepared bysuspending 500 grams of S. alba seed meal in 2 liters of deionized waterand extracting the mixture with 500 milliliters of ethyl acetate for 24hours. The ethyl acetate extract was separated by decanting the toporganic layer after centrifugation, dried with 100 g of anhydrous sodiumsulfate overnight, and concentrated under vacuum at laboratorytemperature. The crude 4-hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanate extract wasfurther purified by preparative column chromatography on silica gel (500grams). Elution was achieved in a stepwise fashion using six100-milliter aliquots of eluent composed of pentane and methylenechloride at ratios of 100:0, 80:20, 60:40, 40:60, 20:80, and 0:100.Content of 4-hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanate within the fractions wasverified by GC-MS using instrumentation and conditions as describedpreviously. Fractions containing 4-hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanate werecombined and concentrated under vacuum at laboratory temperatureproducing a yellowish, viscous fluid displaying only 4-hydroxybenzylisothiocyanate and pentane/methylene chloride solvent peaks in the GCchromatogram. No further concentration of 4-hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanatewas achieved using vacuum distillation because of its instability.

The pH stability of 4-hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanate was analyzed byincubating 25 μL of partially purified extract dissolved in 25milliliters of eight different buffers with pH values ranging from 3.0to 6.5 (FIG. 2). 0.1 M buffers were used, and were prepared by mixing0.2 M sodium citrate and citric acid solutions in pre-calculated ratiosranging from 4 milliliters sodium citrate and 46 milliliters citric acidto 41 milliliters sodium citrate and 9 milliliters citric acid in atotal volume of 100 milliliters. Actual pH values of the buffers of3.03, 3.52, 4.02, 4.49, 5.00, 5.46, 5.91, and 6.52 were verified usingan Orion model 420A pH meter (Orion Research, Boston). At specific timesduring the incubation a 1-milliliter sample was withdrawn from thebuffered reaction solution with a syringe and injected into a WatersIntegrity HPLC system (2695 separation module, 996 PDA, and TMD)equipped with a 150×2 mm i.d., 5 μm Aqua C-18 column (Phenomenex). Theinstrument was operated at a constant flow rate of 200 μL/min with agradient from 5 to 35% of methanol during each 30-minute run. Half-livesfor 4 hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanate were estimated from straight linesobtained by plotting the natural logarithm of the normalizedconcentration versus time (FIG. 2). This experiment was repeated twicewith two different meal extracts acquired by the same procedures fromthe same seed material. Half-lives from only one of the experiments arereported since the results for both experiments were similar.

Release of SCN⁻ from S. alba Seed Meal.

Ten grams of defatted S. alba meal were weighed into a 250-mLpolyethylene bottle to which was added 200 milliliters of deionizedwater or a citrate buffer solution (pH of 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, or 7.0)prepared as described previously. The samples were placed on areciprocating shaker for 48 hours during which time 5.0-milliliteraliquots were removed periodically to determine the time course of SCN⁻release. Each 5-milliliter aliquot was placed in a 50-millilitercentrifuge tube and 40.0 milliliters of a methanol:deionized water (2:1,v:v) solution containing 1% acetic acid was added. The tubes were shakenvigorously for 15 minutes, centrifuged for 5 minutes at 1073 g, and 5milliliters of the supernatant filtered through a 25-mm, 0.2-μm GD/Xmembrane (Whatman) into a beaker. One milliliter of the filtered samplewas then transferred to an HPLC autosampler vial to which was added 0.50milliliter of a 0.01 M Fe³⁺ solution and 100 μL of a 0.1 M HCl solution.The vials were capped, shaken, and immediately analyzed using a WatersIntegrity HPLC system equipped only with a 5-μm, 10×2 mm i.d. Aqua C-18pre-column (Phenomenex). A 50-μL sample was injected and isocraticallyeluted using a 10% methanol solution pumped at a flow rate of 0.5milliliter/minute. Absolute concentrations of SCN⁻ in the unknownsamples were determined following the same procedure as described above,except that 10.0 grams of S. alba meal from which the glucosinolates hadbeen removed with repeated methanol extraction was substituted for theunaltered meal. Amounts of a KSCN stock solution containing 10 to 100μmol of SCN⁻ were added to the meal/buffer mixtures prior to the initialshaking and a separate standard curve prepared for each buffer pH (FIG.18).

Glucosinolates in S. alba Meal.

As expected, sinalbin was the major glucosinolate in S. alba meal,constituting approximately 93% of total glucosinolate content. Themeasured concentration of sinalbin in defatted meal was 152±5.2μmol/gram (mean value±variance of five replicates). The meal alsoincluded (2R)-2-hydroxybut-3-enyl glucosinolate (3.6 μmol/g) and fiveunidentified glucosinolate peaks with a total estimated glucosinolateconcentration of approximately 6.4 μmol/g. Concentrations of indolylglucosinolates that could potentially produce SCN⁻ as a result ofhydrolytic instability of their respective isothiocyanates represented atotal of only about 1 μmol/g of defatted seed meal. Simplicity of theglucosinolate profile in S. alba meal thus facilitates our ability todetermine a likely precursor for glucosinolate hydrolysis products thatmight be identified. Most important is the fact that low concentrationsof indolyl glucosinolates eliminate the possibility that these compoundscan serve as precursors of significant amounts SCN⁻ that might bemeasured in hydrolyzed extracts.

4-Hydroxybenzyl Isothiocyanate Release from S. alba Seed Meal. Adramatic difference was observed between the relatively high yield of4-hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanate obtained by continuously extracting intoethyl acetate as compared to periodic measurements made by adding ethylacetate 30 minutes prior to each respective sampling time (FIG. 19).Maximum 4-hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanate extracted during the continuousprocedure was 162 μmol/gram seed meal at 24 hours, whereas less than 10μmol/gram was extracted at any one time in the periodic analyses. Incontrast, when continuous and periodic extractions were performed withbenzyl isothiocyanate, comparable concentrations of the compound weremeasured in the ethyl acetate extracts irrespective of the procedure.2-Propenyl, butyl, and t-octyl isothiocyanates showed extraction yieldssimilar to that of benzyl isothiocyanate ranging from at least 98% forall isothiocyanates in the continuous extraction to a low of 83% for2-propenyl isothiocyanate in the periodic extraction.

These results establish that 4-hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanate is unstablein aqueous media, and that isolation and purification require the use ofnon-reactive solvents.

Stability of 4-Hydroxybenzyl Isothiocyanate in Buffered AqueousSolutions.

Partially purified and concentrated seed meal extracts containing4-hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanate were dissolved in buffers ranging from pH3.0 to 6.5. The half-life of 4-hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanate at pH 6.5was the shortest at 6 minutes, increasing to 16, 49, 100, 195, 270, 312,and 321 minutes with decreasing pH values of 6.0, 5.5, 5.0, 4.5, 4.0,3.5, and 3.0, respectively (FIG. 2). Hydrolytic instability of4-hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanate, especially at higher pH values, explainsits low extractability in unbuffered extracts of seed meal that had a pHof 5.3 and a sampling time of 48 hours. Appreciable hydrolysis occurs atpH values as low as 3.0 and in a soil environment buffered at pH valuestypically between 5 and 7, significant amounts of SCN⁻ production areexpected in a relatively short time period.

Ionic Thiocyanate Release from S. alba Seed Meal.

S. alba seed meal was incubated with deionized water and buffersolutions ranging from pH 4.0 to 7.0 to quantify SCN⁻ productionresulting from 4-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolate hydrolysis in the presenceof a full component of meal constituents (FIG. 18). SCN⁻ productionoccurred most slowly at pH 4.0, but final concentrations determined at48 hours varied from a low at pH 6.0 of 143 and a high in deionizedwater of 166 μmol/gram seed meal. The amount of SCN⁻ expected based on4-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolate concentration in the meal and theassumption of its complete stoichiometric conversion to SCN⁻ isapproximately 152 μmol/g seed meal, thus indicating near completeconversion in 48 hours at all pH values.

Results obtained with seed meal incubations confirm conclusions reachedusing 4-OH benzyl glucosinolate extracts, clearly indicating that4-hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanate is rapidly hydrolyzed to SCN⁻ at pHvalues expected in most soils. In contrast, data from previousinvestigations conducted with purified sinalbin and myrosinase indicatethat decreased pH values promote the formation of 4-hydroxybenzylcyanide at the expense of 4-hydroxybenzyl isothiocyanate, therebydecreasing subsequent formation of SCN⁻ by approximately 50% at pH 3.0as compared to pH 7.0. The presence of additional meal componentsmoderates the influence of pH on the production of 4-hydroxybenzylcyanide, thus preserving SCN⁻ formation. Application of S. alba seedmeal to soil with the addition of sufficient water to promoteglucosinolate hydrolysis is expected to produce an amount of SCN⁻stoichiometrically equivalent to the amount of 4-hydroxybenzylglucosinolate within the meal.

SCN⁻ production in soils amended with S. alba seed meal has significantconsequences with respect to phytotoxicity and the use of meal as abioherbicide. The herbicidal activity of SCN⁻ is well known andcommercial formulations containing NH₄SCN have been marketed. Amendmentrates necessary for weed control have been determined by a number ofinvestigators for NH₄ ⁺, K⁺, and Na⁺ salts with complete removal of allvegetative cover reportedly occurring for a period of 4 months when SCN⁻was applied at rates of 270 to 680 kg/ha. Higher rates of 1,366 kgSCN⁻/ha were necessary for complete plant kill for 4 months, but a largepercentage of the weeds were removed with only 137 kilograms SCN⁻/ha.Application rates were that might alter wheat germination, and it wasfound that 342 kilograms SCN⁻/ha caused inhibition, but that the effectwas no longer observed at 69 days post application. Solutions of SCN⁻sprayed directly on vegetative growth showed that cotton defoliation waspossible using only 8.6 kilograms SCN⁻/ha.

Amounts of SCN⁻ contributed from S. alba seed meal used here, assumingcomplete stoichiometric conversion, would amount to 8.8, 17.7, and 35.3kg SCN⁻/ha for amendment rates of 1000, 2000, and 4000 kilogramsmeal/ha, respectively. Although glucosinolate concentrations in the S.alba meal used were not reported, weed control effects have beenobserved with application rates of 1000 to 2000 kilograms/ha.Phytoxicity also has been observed towards weed and crop species whenmeal was amended to greenhouse or field soils at rates from 1000 to 4000kilograms meal/ha. SCN⁻ rates provided in S. alba meal, although not ashigh as those used previously in phytotoxicity studies with solublesalts, provide SCN⁻ in amounts of potential value in weed control.

In addition to weed control benefits afforded by SCN⁻ produced as aresult of glucosinolate hydrolysis, the meals contain between 5 and 6% Nthat when mineralized represents an important nutrient source to cropplants. Organic agriculture may thus benefit from the use of S. albameal as a soil amendment both through weed control and as a nutrientsource. Potential environmental effects appear minimal given thatbiological degradation of SCN⁻ has been observed in soils and S. alba istypically grown as a condiment mustard for human consumption.

Glucosinolate concentrations in Brassicaceae seed meals as may bedetermined according to the method of this example are shown in Table 1below.

TABLE 1 Glucosinolate concentrations in Brassicaceae seed meals. B.juncea B. napus B. napus S. alba “Pacific “Athena” “Sunrise” “Ida Gold”Gold” Glucosinolate R-group μmol g⁻¹ of sample (2R)-2-hydroxy-3-butenyl1.5 1.3 3.4 0.5 2-propenyl 123.8 (2S)-2-hydroxy-3-butenyl) 0.42-hydroxy-4-butenyl) 0.2 1.8 (2R)-2-hydroxy-4-pentenyl 0.54-hydroxy-benzyl 148.1 Unknown 9.1 3-butenyl 2.8 2.74-hydroxy-3-indolylmethyl 11.3 10.9 0.74 (0.28) unknown 2.6 unknown 0.744-pentenyl 1.3 1.4 3-indolylmethyl 0.9 0.8 4-methylthiobutyl 1.7N-methoxy-3- 0.1 0.01 0.6 indolylmethyl unknown 1.33 TOTAL 20.1 17.2165.75 126.14

Highest glucosinolate concentrations were measured in S. alba IdaGoldmeal with 4-OH benzyl showing as the dominant glucosinolate. The B.juncea variety Pacific Gold had the next highest glucosinolateconcentration, with propenyl glucosinolate dominating the total. It hasbeen shown that both 4-OH benzyl and propenyl glucosinolates produce ITCas an end product of hydrolysis at typical soil pH values.

More recent evidence indicates that this assumption is not true for 4-OHbenzyl glucosinolate. ITC production is significant since this compoundis considered to be the most toxic of all glucosinolate hydrolysisproducts and thus most important in pest control. Recent results withweed seed bioassays prompted a reevaluation of this assumption andfurther prompted considering the inhibitory properties of othercompounds, such as ionic thiocyanate.

The remaining B. napus varieties, Athena and Sunrise, were included asthey routinely are used as an amendment in bioassay control experiments,and only low glucosinolate concentrations were present.

Example 3

This example concerns the effects of processing and storing disclosedcompositions. In an effort to facilitate dispersal of meal in futureapplications a pelletization trial was conducted for several seed meals.Equipment used for pelleting grains into animal feed was used to formpellets comprising small amounts of both Athena and IdaGold seed meal.This process normally includes a step of exposing the stock material tohigh-temperature steam, which aids in producing a stable pellet;however, this step was excluded to retain intact glucosinolates withinthe meal. The end product extruded was a relatively stable pellet havinga diameter of 0.4 cm and a length ranging from 1-3 cm. With this shape,these pellets would theoretically allow the material to be applied withexisting equipment and without using special modifications.

Once sample pellets were obtained, they were reground to form a finepowder and the glucosinolate profile was compared to the stock meal usedto make pellets. Additionally the total glucosinolate content of olderstocks of B. napus Dwarf Essex, S. alba IdaGold, and B. juncea PacificGold meal from previous harvests in 2001 were compared to the same mealsproduced during 2002. This comparison was conducted to determine ifsignificant amounts of glucosinolates were lost during storage for up toa year. With the exception of Athena, neither the process of convertingmeal flakes into pellets, nor storing the meal for approximately a yearhad much effect on the total glucosinolate content (FIG. 3). Thecomparison of old and new stocks of Dwarf Essex, IdaGold, and PacificGold meal revealed little difference in composition and heterogeneity.It is likely that variability could be attributed to differentenvironmental conditions experienced between growing seasons of the twoharvests. Timing of moisture, growing degree days, and level of damagefrom insects each could have affected the final glucosinolate profile ofthe harvested seed. The process of producing pellets from the meal hadno detrimental effect on the glucosinolate content, and the intensephysical homogenization which occurs prior to the extrusion of thepellets appeared to decrease the final variability of totalglucosinolates within the IdaGold meal.

Example 4

This example concerns isothiocyanate release from cold pressed meals.Glucosinolate hydrolysis is necessary for ITC release. Only a portion ofthe glucosinolate is actually converted to ITC. Initial efforts werethus directed towards quantifying the proportion of ITC producedrelative to the original glucosinolate concentration. The effectivenessof modifying meal products to enhance ITC release can thus be determinedby monitoring for an increase in release efficiency.

Ten grams of meal were mixed with 40 milliliters of deionized water and10 milliliters of ethyl acetate containing 1 μl decane as an internalstandard. The mixture was shaken and samples were removed periodicallyduring a time period of 96 hours. Analysis of the samples was performedused GC-MS. An HP 5890A gas chromatograph coupled with an HP 5972 seriesA Mass Detector was used, along with a DB-5 capillary column (30 in×320pm, 0.25 pm film). Ethyl acetate extracts were manually injected into asplit/splitless port (250 liters, 20 seconds split), and the temperatureof the GC oven was programmed from 65° C. (iso 3 minutes) to 270° C.(iso 5 minutes) with a rate 15° C./minute. Average linear flow rate ofhelium at 250° C. was 35 cm/minute. Quantification of data (total ioncurrent) was performed using decane as internal standard in all samplesand calibration with benzyl isothiocyanate. Isothiocyanate releaseefficiency in the form of a percentage was calculated using thefollowing equation.Release efficiency=(Isothiocyanate/Glucosinolate)×100

Stoichiometry for glucosinolate hydrolysis shows that each mole ofglucosinolate is expected to release 1 mole of ITC. Release efficiencieslower than 100% will occur when ITC amounts are less than glucosinolateamounts within the respective meal.

FIGS. 20-22 provide time release curves. FIG. 20 provides a time releasecurve for propenyl ITC from B. juncea Pacific Gold meal. Maximum ITCrelease of 88 μmol/gram seed meal occurred at 10 hours. This amount ofITC is equivalent to a release efficiency of 80%. Thus 80% of theglucosinolate potentially available was actually measured as ITC. FIGS.21 and 22 provide the ITC release curves for S. alba IdaGold and B.napus Dwarf Essex. The ITC release efficiency from S. alba IdaGold is29% (FIG. 21) and that for B. napus Dwarf Essex is 65% (FIG. 22).Increased release efficiencies translate into more effective pestcontrol.

Release efficiency data indicate that little benefit exists forattempting to enhance propenyl release from B. juncea meal. Greaterbenefit may be realized by increasing ITC release from S. alba mealsince the release efficiency was only 29%. However, the meal alreadycontains high 4-OH benzyl concentrations that may reduce the need forsuch enhancement. In addition, for S. alba it is quite possible thatrelease efficiency is not the only contributing factor to the measuredlow ITC concentrations. Measured concentrations are a function ofopposing ongoing processes that include both ITC production and ITCdissipation. For S. alba, dissipation may occur at a relatively highrate, thus decreasing the mass of ITC accumulating in the medium. Thisindeed is what was observed to occur. 4-OH Benzyl isothiocyanate isunstable and thus is degraded to form SCN⁻.

Example 5

No effect of S. alba meal on soil insects and nematodes was observed.The lack of a biological response with S. alba meal was puzzling giventhe fact that this meal contained the highest concentration ofglucosinolate, that being predominantly 4-OH benzyl. It was assumed thatITC formed from 4-OH benzyl glucosinolate is stable unless subjected tostrong alkali, at which time it is hydrolyzed and SCN⁻ is formed.Release efficiency data indicate that such thinking may not accuratelyreflect 4-OH benzyl ITC behavior.

The pH stability of 4-OH benzyl ITC was assayed by incubating it in 5buffer solutions (sodium acetate/acetic acid from pH range 3 to 5 andmonosodium phosphate/phosphatic acid for pH above 5) with pH rangingfrom 3.0 to 7.0. At specific times during the incubation a sample fromthe incubated solution was withdrawn with a syringe and injected into anHPLC-PDA (Waters Integrity system, separation module 2695, photodiodearray detector 996, column Phenomenex Aqua C-18, 5 μm, 150×2 mm, with aconstant flow rate of 200 μl/minute gradient from 5 to 35% of methanolin 30 minutes). The amount of 4-OH benzyl ITC was determined usingcalibration with benzyl ITC.

TABLE 2 Stability of 4-OH benzyl isothiocyanate at different pH levelspH Half Life (Minutes) 3 216 4 126 5 90 6 6 7 4.84-OH benzyl isothiocyanate was not stable even at pH values of 3.0. Thehalf-life decreases with an increase in pH from 3.6 hours at pH 3.0 toless than 5 minutes at pH 7.0. Thus in a soil environment 4-OH benzylITC will be produced from S. alba meal but because it is unstable, willhydrolyze rapidly to produce ionic thiocyanate as shown below.

The lack of a negative effect on insects, nematodes, and fungi is causedby the rapid hydrolysis of 4-OH benzyl ITC. This instability may alsocontribute to the low release efficiencies that were measured. However,the fact that S. alba meal is an effective herbicide indicates that oneof the hydrolysis products is responsible. Literature indicates thatSCN⁻ is indeed phytotoxic and thus of likely importance in weedinhibition.

Example 6

This example concerns determining soil pH effective for maintainingbioactivity of disclosed plant material, processed plant material,composition comprising plant material, or composition comprisingprocessed plant material. Soil is sampled up to depth 35 cm usingstainless steel soil probe of diameter 20 mm. Three replicate soilsamples were taken from individual plots, and similar depths were mergedinto one soil sample. Soil cores for depth 0-5, 5-10, 10-15, and 15-25centimeters were individually transferred into marked plastic storagebags for temporary storage.

Soil samples were homogenized by hand directly in storage bags, andtransferred into pre-weighed and marked 250-mL PE bottles. Afteraddition of 200 milliliters of extracting solution, (5 mmol/L solutionof calcium chloride in DI water) and 1.00 milliliter of internalstandard (100 mmol/L solution of potassium bromide in DI water) PEbottles were tightly closed, and shaken on reciprocating shaker for 60minutes. PE bottles with shaken samples were left on a laboratory benchfor another hour, to allow soil particles to sediment. It is possible toaccelerate sedimentation using centrifugation. Supernatant from abovewas drawn into a 10-milliliter syringe, and immediately filtered into amarked autosampler vial using an in-line disposable filter (PVDF Filtermedia, 25 mm diameter, 0.45 μm pore size, Whatman, N.J., USA).

Approximately 10-gram soil samples from a particular depth profile weremerged across the field and put into pre-weighed metal cans, andreweighed. The samples were then dried in an oven set at a temperatureof about 120° C. until the samples had a constant weight.

Soil extracts were analyzed using ion chromatograph (Dionex, Sunnyvale,Calif., USA) in the following configurations and conditions: GP40gradient pumps, ED40 electrochemical detector, and AS40 automatedsampler, 250 μL sampling loop, gradient elution from 5 to 80 mmol/Lpotassium hydroxide in 15 minutes, column IonPacAS16, 4×250 mm, softwarePeakNet v 5.01.

A standard solution of 100 mmol/L of potassium thiocyanate in DI waterwas precisely diluted to obtain calibration solutions in a range from 1μMon to 10 mmol/L. One milliliter of calibration solution was pipettedinto 200 milliliters of extracting solution (5 mmol/L calcium chloridein DI water). Samples for all concentration levels were created intriplicates. Calibration solutions were analyzed exactly the same way asthe field soil samples.

Data files were integrated automatically using PeakNet software suppliedwith instrument. All chromatograms were checked for missed or undetectedpeaks of thiocyanate anion, and when necessary, thiocyanate anion peakswere integrated manually. The same integration parameters were appliedfor field soil samples and for calibration solutions. A calibrationcurve was obtained by linear regression of thiocyanate peak areas versusthiocyanate concentrations. Concentrations of thiocyanate anion in soilsamples were estimated using slope and constant value of linearregression of calibration data. Results, shown in FIG. 23 (S. alba),FIG. 24 (B. napus) and FIG. 25 (B. juncea) are expressed per onekilogram of dry soil, using known moisture content of the soil samples.

Example 7

Sinapis alba meal was expected to have the greatest effect on fungusgnats. However, initial trials showed little response. The lack of aresponse prompted a reevaluation of the chemistry, eventually leading tothe determination that S. alba is ineffective against insects becausethe isothiocyanate produced is unstable.

Fungus gnat control with cold pressed meal: Four different meals, B.juncea ‘Pacific Gold’, S. alba ‘IdaGold’, B. napus ‘Dwarf Essex’, and B.napus ‘Athena’, were used in a series of bioassay experiments todetermine pesticidal behavior against fungus gnats. The effectiveness ofvolatiles in closed containers was determined in which the meal wasphysically separated from the test organism. Only volatiles from thewetted meal were allowed to contact the bioassay organism. The effect ofmeal incorporation and top dressing were also assessed in separateexperiments. Specific details of each trial are shown below in Tables3-12. These tables show data collected in preliminary experimentsdesigned to determine the effects of meal volatiles on fungus gnatadults. B. juncea ‘Pacific Gold’ showed complete control, whereas S.alba ‘IdaGold’ was ineffective. The high glucosinolate B. napus ‘DwarfEssex’ showed partial control and as expected, low glucosinolate B.napus ‘Athena’ had no effect on adult fungus gnat survival. Preliminaryresults with larvae were similar, except that Dwarf Essex showed noeffect.

Meal incorporation into the potting medium showed similar trends withrespect to fungus gnat toxicity. B. juncea meal showed complete fungusgnat control at a rate of 3%, whereas S. alba showed little impact at arate of 6% (w:w). Nematodes were completely eliminated by B. juncea, butnot S. alba meal.

Gnat larvae were killed by isothiocyanate volatiles from B. juncea, butnot from B. napus or S. alba. This is in line with many of the otherbioassays. Sinapis alba is not toxic to larvae. Volatiles produced fromBrassica napus ‘Dwarf Essex’ or ‘Athena’ were not toxic. Either thevolatiles were not produced or they were produced at levels that werebelow a threshold level of toxicity.

Fungus gnat survival was determined by counting the number of adultsthat emerged from the respective treatments. High glucosinolate B. napusand S. alba meals showed some control at rates of 10%, but neverequivalent to that of B. juncea. Nematode survival in the potting mixalso was determined, and only B. juncea completely eliminated nematodes.

With respect to fungus gnat larval survival for trials with largernumbers of replicates, the most effective treatment is B. juncea mealamendment at 3 and 6%. Decreased fungal gnat survival with amendment ofB. napus Dwarf Essex and S. alba meals was determined, but even 6%amendment did not result in acceptable fungus gnat control.

With reference to the effect of meal top-dressing and minimal soilincorporation on the survival of fungus gnat larvae, significantdecreases in emerging numbers of adult fungus gnats when B. juncea mealwas either top-dressed or incorporated into the top 6-7 mm of pottingmix. There was no difference between any of the 3% and 6% treatments.

TABLE 3 Fungus gnat adult volatile experiment¹ (n = 1) number adultsalive: Treatment² after 90 minutes after 17 hrs after 24 hrs Peat moss(control) 10 8 8 B. juncea (Pacific Gold) 0 0 0 S. alba (IdaGold) 10 8 5¹Bioassay chamber consisted of a 50-dram snap-cap plastic vial, with 10adults place in 9-dram snap cap vial with organdy top and drop of applesauce for sustenance. Treatment material was placed at the bottom of the50-dram vial. ²Treatments: 1) 0.75 g peat moss + 4 ml water; 2) 0.75 gBrassica juncea meal + 4 ml water; and 3) 0.75 g Sinapis alba meal + 4ml water.

TABLE 4 Fungus gnat adult volatile experiment¹ (n = 2) Mean numberadults alive after: 30 60 90 6 18 24 Treatment² min. min. min. hrs hrshrs B napus (Athena) 10 10 10 10 9.5 7.5 B. napus (Dwarf Essex) 10 10 109.5 7.0 3.0 ¹Bioassay chamber consisted of a 50-dram snap-cap plasticvial, with 10 adults place in 9-dram snap cap vial with organdy top anddrop of apple sauce for sustenance. Treatment material was placed at thebottom of the 2-dram glass vial. ²Treatments: 1) 0.75 g Brassica napus(Athena) + 4 ml water; 2) 0.75 g Brassica napus (S37) meal + 4 ml water.

TABLE 5 Fungus gnat larval volatile experiment¹ (n- = 2) Mean numberlarvae alive: Treatment² after 90 minutes after 20 hrs after 43 hrs Peatmoss (control) 10 10 10 B. juncea (Pacific Gold) 10 0 0 S. alba(IdaGold) 10 10 10 ¹Bioassay chamber consisted of a 50-dram snap-capplastic vial, with 10 last-instar larvae placed on small piece of agarsprinkled with small amount of sifted alfalfa meal in open 4-dram glassvial. Treatment material placed in a separate open 4-dram glass vial.²Treatments: 1) 0.75 g peat moss + 4 ml water; 2) 0.75 g Brassica junceameal + 4 ml water; and 3) 0.75 g Sinapis alba meal + 4 ml water.

TABLE 6 Fungus gnat larval volatile experiment¹ (n- = 2) Mean numberlarvae alive after: Treatment² 90 min. 17 hrs 24 hrs B. napus (Athena)10 9.5 9.5 B. napus (Dwarf Essex) 10 9.5 9.5 ¹Bioassay chamber consistedof a 50-dram snap-cap plastic vial, with 10 last-instar larvae placed onsmall piece of agar sprinkled with small amount of sifted alfalfa mealin open 4-dram glass vial. Treatment material placed in a separate open4-dram glass vial. ²Treatments: 1) 0.75 g Brassica napus (Athena) + 4 mlwater; 2) 0.75 g Brassica napus (S37) meal + 4 ml water.

TABLE 7 Incorporation of meal into soil experiment (n = 3) Mean numberfungus gnat nematodes Treatment adults emerged per pot present (day 13)B. napus 3% (control) 15.7 yes B. juncea 1% 11.3 yes B. juncea 3% 0.0 noB. juncea 6% 0.0 noTreatments consisted of approximately 18 grams dry weight of a Sunshinemix no. 2/composted bark mixture (7:3); mixed with 1, 2, or 3% meal(Brassica napus ‘Athena’ or Brassica juncea ‘Pacific Gold’); plusapproximately 1.6 grams dry pinto beans (soaked for 24 hours in water)for larval food; plus the appropriated amount of water to have a moistmixture. This mixture was placed in plant pots (6 cm×6 cm×8 cm ht).Twenty fungus gnat larvae were added to the mixture in each of the pots.Numbers of adults emerging were recorded daily.

TABLE 8 Incorporation of meal into soil experiment (n = 3) Mean numberfungus gnat nematodes Treatment adults emerged per pot present (day 14)B. napus 3% (control) 15.0 yes S. alba 1% 15.0 yes S. alba 3% 14.7 yesS. alba 6% 12.7 yes

Treatments consisted of approximately 18 grams dry weight of a Sunshinemix no. 2/composted bark mixture (7:3); mixed with 1, 2, or 3% meal(Brassica napus ‘Athena’ or Sinapis alba ‘IdaGold’); plus approximately1.6 grams dry pinto beans (soaked for 24 hours in water) for larvalfood; plus the appropriated amount of water to have a moist mixture.This mixture was placed in plant pots (6 cm×6 cm×8 cm ht). Twenty fungusgnat larvae were added to the mixture in each of the pots. Numbers ofadults emerging were recorded daily.

TABLE 9 Gnat Larval Volatile Experiment¹ (n = 10). Mean number larvaeper container alive (% alive) after: Treatment 2 hrs 4 hrs 24 hrs²Brassica napus 20.0 (100%) 20.0 (100%)  19.9 (99.5%) (Athena) Brassicanapus 20.0 (100%) 20.0 (100%) 19.6 (98%) (Dwarf Essex) Brassica juncea16.6 (83%)  0.0 (0%)  0.0 (0%) (Pacific Gold) Sinapis alba 20.0 (100%)20.0 (100%) 19.4 (97%) (IdaGold) (batch 1) ¹Bioassay chamber consistedof a 50-dram snap-cap plastic vial, with 20 last-instar larvae placed onsmall piece of agar sprinkled with small amount of sifted alfalfa mealin open 4-dram glass vial. Treatment material (1.0 g meal) placed in aseparate open 4-dram glass vial. Five milliliters of water added to mealat start of experiment. Experiment set up on Feb. 21, 2002. ²Dead larvaein B. napus and S. alba treatments appear to have drowned, exceptpossibly one larva in Dwarf Essex treatment.

TABLE 10 Incorporation of meal into soil experiment (n = 5). Mean numberfungus gnat % survival nematodes adults emerged (larvae to presentTreatment per pot adult) (day 14) B. napus (Athena) 20% 13.6 ± 0.9 a  68yes B. napus (D. Essex) 20% 10.8 ± 2.0 ab 54 yes B. napus (D. Essex) 10% 8.2 ± 1.2 bc 41 yes B. napus (D. Essex) 30%  7.4 ± 0.9 cd 37 yes S.alba 10% (batch 2) 5.0 ± 1.4 d 25 yes S. alba 20% (batch 2) 2.0 ± 0.4 e10 yes S. alba 30% (batch 2) 1.8 ± 0.0 e 9 yes B. juncea 20% 0.0 ± 0.0 e0 no B. juncea 10% 0.0 ± 0.0 e 0 no B. juncea 30% 0.0 ± 0.0 e 0 no

Treatments consisted of approximately 18 grams dry weight of a Sunshinemix no. 2/composted bark mixture (7:3); mixed with 10, 20, or 30% meal;plus approximately 1.6 grams dry pinto beans (soaked for 24 hours inwater) for larval food; plus the appropriated amount of water to have amoist mixture. This mixture was placed in plant pots (6 cm×6 cm×8 cmht). Twenty fungus gnat larvae were added to the mixture in each of thepots. Pots were placed in 1-quart canning jars with organdy top. Numbersof adults emerging were recorded daily. Soil mix was oven-driedovernight before use. Experiment set up on Feb. 28, 2002.

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantlydifferent (P=0.05) using protected LSD.

TABLE 11 Incorporation of meal into soil experiment (n = 10). Meannumber fungus gnat percent survival Treatment adults emerged per pot(larvae to adult) S. alba 1% (batch 2) 15.6 ± 0.7 a  78.0 S. alba 3%(batch 2) 15.3 ± 0.6 ab 78.0 B. juncea 1% 14.8 ± 1.1 ab 73.5 B. napus(D. Essex) 3% 14.3 ± 0.9 ab 71.5 B. napus 6% (Athena) 14.0 ± 1.1 ab 70.0S. alba 6% (batch 2) 12.7 ± 0.9 b  63.5 B. napus (D. Essex) 1% 12.5 ±1.6 b  62.5 B. napus (D. Essex) 6% 7.9 ± 1.5 c 39.5 B. juncea 3% 0.7 ±0.6 d 3.5 B. juncea 6% 0.0 ± 0.0 d 0.0

Treatments consisted of approximately 18 grams dry weight of a Sunshinemix no. 2/composted bark mixture (7:3); mixed with 10, 20, or 30% meal;plus 4 halves of pinto beans (soaked for 24 hours in water) for larvalfood; plus the appropriated amount of water to have a moist mixture.This mixture was placed in plant pots (6 cm×6 cm×8 cm ht). Twenty fungusgnat larvae were added to the mixture in each of the pots. Pots wereplaced in 1-quart canning jars with sealed tops for 24 hours, at whichtime organdy cloth replaced the lid. Numbers of adults emerging wererecorded daily. Soil mix was oven-dried overnight before use. First fivereps were set up on March 5 and second five reps were set up on Mar. 13,2002.

Means in a column followed by the same letter are not significantlydifferent (P=0.05) using protected LSD.

TABLE 12 Meal top-dressing and meal-incorporation into soil surfaceexperiment (n = 4). Mean number fungus gnat adults emerged Mean %survival Mean dry Treatment per pot (larvae to adult) wt. Root No meal,13.3 ± 0.9 a  66.3 * no disturbance No meal, 13.0 ± 1.6 a  65.0disturbance B. juncea 9.3 ± 1.4 ab 46.3 1%, top-dressing B. juncea 7.8 ±2.4 bc 38.8 1%, incorporated 6-7 mm B. juncea 3.8 ± 1.9 cd 18.8 3%,top-dressing B. juncea  5.8 ± 1.8 bcd 28.8 3%, incorporated 6-7 mm B.juncea 2.3 ± 1.3 d  11.3 6%, top-dressing B. juncea 2.8 ± 1.3 d  13.86%, incorporated 6-7 mm Pinto bean seeds were planted into soil mixture(19 or 20 grams dry weight) in plant pots (6 cm × 6 cm × 8 cm ht) onMarch 9 (block 1) and Mar. 21, 2002 (block2). Soil mixture consisted ofSunshine mix no. 2/composted bark mixture (7:3). Twenty fungus gnatlarvae were added March 25 (block 1) and April 2 (block 2) to the soilmixture (~1-2 cm deep) in each of the pots. Pots were placed in 1-quartcanning jars with organdy top. Numbers of adults emerging were recordeddaily. Soil mix was oven-dried overnight before use. Twenty-five mlwater was added to soil surface of each pot (block 1) on March 28, March31, April 3, and April 7. Twenty ml water was added to soil surface ofeach pot (block 2) on April 15, April 8, April 11, and April 14. Meansin a column followed by the same letter are not significantly different(P = 0.05) using protected LSD. * = root not weighed

Example 8

It was expected that Sinapis alba meal would produce an isothiocyanatethat would inhibit mycelial growth of this fungal pathogen. However, nosuch effect was observed, thus prompting a determination of the fate of4-OH benzyl isothiocyanate.

Mycelial Growth of Fusarium Oxysporum in the Presence of Different Meals

F. oxysporum strains #9051C, #9243G, #9321A and #9312 F were obtainedfrom forest nurseries in which this fungal pathogen is a problem.Toxicity of meal volatiles against mycelial growth was determined inclosed containers. Growth was determined by measuring colony diameters.

FIG. 26 shows that B. juncea Pacific Gold meal completed suppressedmycelial growth of F. oxysporum in these bioassays. B. napus Dwarf Essexhad a slight effect on growth. No effect of S. alba on mycelial growthwas observed in current bioassays. It is possible that volatile productsfrom S. alba are minimal and that fungal inhibition may occur ifnon-volatile glucosinolate hydrolysis products bioassayed. However, thisseems unlikely given the fact that little effect on fungus gnats andnematodes was observed when using S. alba meal. All isolates behavedsimilarly.

Example 9

Glasshouse Seed Meal Toxicity on Plant Growth

Plant health can be affected by a variety of soil-borne pests anddiseases, including: bacteria, fungi, nematodes, insects, and weeds.Much is now know about the effect of glucosinolate breakdown products ona wide range of soil-borne pests and diseases. However, there has beenlittle effort made to determine the effect of these compounds on cropplants planted after soil treatment. This study was designed todetermine the effect of time after planting on crop plant growth.

Sunshine mix potting soil was incorporated with 1-ton, 2-ton, and 4-tonequivalent of Brassica napus, Brassica juncea, and Sinapis alba, seedmeals and potting mix with no amendment as control. After incorporation,the seedling flats were filled and randomly arranged on a bench. Seedsof canola (B. napus), oriental mustard (B. juncea), yellow mustard (S.alba), lettuce (Lactuca sative), sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) and corn(Zea mays) were planted into amended soil treatments 1 day, 2 day, and 4days after incorporation. Plant counts were recorded daily and after 22days above ground biomass was determined on each sample. Theexperimental design was a 3 replicate split plot design with days aftertreatment as main plots and soil amendment as sub-plots.

Seedling emergence and plant growth of canola, oriental mustard andyellow mustard were all greatly affected when planted into amended soilscompared to the control. Soil amended with S. alba meal showed lowestplant survival levels whereby less that 30% of seedlings either failedto emerge or survive compared to the control where 100% survival wasfound. B. napus-amended soils resulted in over 80% plant survival, whileB. juncea was intermediate with just over 51% plant survival. A similarresult occurred in corn and sugar beet, where S. alba amended soilshowed significantly lower plant survival compared to B. juncea- or B.napus-amended soils. Lettuce emergence was very poor even in the controltreatment and plant survival levels were not significantly differentover any treatment, albeit that they were all very low. Increasing mealamendment rate significantly reduced plant survival in all speciesexamined. However, lowest survival occurred with S. alba mealtreatments.

Plant dry weight 22 days after planting showed a similar trend to plantcounts. Averaged over amendment rates, plants grown in B. juncea-amendedsoil had above ground biomass which was only 35% that of the control.Plants grown in B. napus-amended soils were only one quarter the biomassof the control plants while plants grown in S. alba-amended soil wereless than 5% dry matter of the control. All seed meals thereforeinterfered with plant growth even when planting was delayed for 4 daysafter the initial soil treatment. Plant stunting was not significantlydifferent when seeds were planted immediately after soil amendment orwhen planting was delayed for 4 days after treatment. Corn and sugarbeet plants were stunted in B. juncea- and S. alba-amended soils in asimilar manner. Canola, both mustards, sugar beet and corn plant dryweights were reduced with increased concentrations of either B. junceaor S. alba meal. It was noted, however, that the lowest concentration ofS. alba meals resulted in plant dry weights equal to the highestconcentration of the other seed meals. Plants grown in B. napus-amendedsoils were significantly higher dry matter than the control. B. napusseed meal had significantly lower concentration of glucosinolatescompared to the two mustard meals studied. It is possible that theconcentration or type of glucosinolate in B. napus does inhibitgermination but not growth after emergence. As all seed meals are highin nitrogen this might explain the larger plants grown in B.napus-amended soils.

Overall, all three meals have potential to significantly reduce seedlingemergence and plant survival in amended soils. S. alba was mosteffective in killing either seeds or seedlings and had the mostdetrimental effect on plant growth. Soils amended with S. alba mealcould offer an alternative biological herbicide. However, more needs tobe done to examine the phytotoxicity effect of Brassicaceae seed mealsoil amendments and their effect on the crop that is to be planted aftertreatment.

Herbicidal Efficacy of Brassica Seed Meal in Glasshouse Studies

Sterilized potting compost was infected with uniform numbers of wild oatand pigweed seeds. After the seeds and compost were mixed they wereamended with S. alba IdaGold (yellow mustard), B. juncea Pacific Gold(Oriental mustard) or B. napus Athena (canola) seed meals at a rate of1.0 ton or 0.5 ton an acre equivalent and weeds seeds allowed togerminate and grow for four weeks. Each treatment combination, alongwith a no treatment control was grown in a four replicate randomizedblock design with each plot being a seedling flat 36×20 cm.

After four weeks the number and dry weight of wild oat plants andpigweed plants was recorded. Amending soil with 1 ton of B. junceaPacific Gold meal reduced wild oat populations from 96 in the control to16. Neither rate of IdaGold amendment showed the same degree of wild oatelimination. In sharp contrast, when the broadleaf weed (pigweed) wasconsidered, the reverse was true whereby the Pacific Gold was lesseffective than the control in controlling weed numbers and asignificantly higher weed biomass was produced in the Pacific Gold soiltreatments. In the case of pigweed, IdaGold was most effective, reducingpopulation numbers by almost 90% compared to the Pacific Gold treatment.These studies are currently being repeated to confirm the strikingresults that one mustard type is controlling grassy weeds while theother is specific to broadleaf weeds.

Initial Field Studies

Initial field studies were conducted to investigate: (1) the effect ofdifferent Brassica species seed meals on establishment and growth ofpotato, corn, strawberry, recrop cherry, cabbage, rutabaga, lettuce,field beans, and spring wheat; and (2) to evaluate herbicidal potentialof using different Brassica seed meals

Potato and Sweet Corn

One super sweet corn cultivar and three potato cultivars (‘Yukon Gold’,‘White Rose’, and ‘IdaRed’) were planted into ridged seed beds. Prior toridging, the complete plot area was divided into strips 20 feet wide.Each strip was assigned to a specific seed meal treatment. Seed mealtreatments were: (1) Brassica napus seed meal at 1 ton/acre; (2) B.napus seed meal at 2 ton/acre; (3) B. juncea seed meal at 1 ton/acre;(4) B. juncea seed meal at 2 ton/acre; (5) Sinapis alba seed meal at 1ton/acre; (6) Sinapis alba seed meal at 2 ton/acre; (7) a chemicaltreatment control; and (8) a no chemical control. The seed meal wasapplied by hand application. The ridges were drawn and the whole plotarea irrigated with approximately 2 inches of irrigation water. The cornand potato cultivars were planted at right angles to the seed mealtreatments 21 days after treatment. The experimental design thereforewas a strip plot design and was replicated twice.

Strawberry and Cherry

Two strawberry cultivars (‘June Bearing’ and ‘Ever Bearing’) and oneself-pollinating ‘Bing’ cherry cultivar were chosen for this study. Thestrawberry research area was divided into eight 20 foot wide strips×36feet long. Each strip was associated with a different seed mealtreatment (B. napus, B. juncea, S. alba and a non-treatment control).Seed meal was applied by hand at a rate of 1 ton/acre, the seed mealworked in by tillage and ridges were drawn. Strawberry plants which hadpreviously been hardened were planted by hand into the ridges 22 daysafter treatment. The experimental design was a strip plot design withcultivars arranged at random within blocks, and four replicates. Eachplot was 20 feet×2 rows.

An area of ground was divided into 20×20 feet units. Each unit wastreated with either 1 ton/acre of each B. juncea or S. alba seed meal, 2ton/acre of each seed meal, and a non-treatment control (i.e. 2 seedmeals types×2 application rates, plus a control). This was replicatedtwice.

On-farm testing of Pacific Gold and IdaGold seed meal as apesticide/nematicide in recrop orchards was initiated at The Dalles inOregon. The complete trial covered 9 acres which was divided into 18×0.5acre plots. In the fall of 2002 a randomized complete block design wassuperimposed on the trial area with 5 treatments: (1) the standardchemical nematicide, Telone®; (2) Pacific Gold meal at 1 ton/acre rateapplied in the fall; (3) Pacific Gold meal at 1 ton/acre rate applied inthe spring (4) Pacific Gold meal at 0.5 ton/acre rate applied in thefall and the spring (5) IdaGold meal at 1 ton/acre rate applied in thefall; (6) IdaGold meal at 1 ton/acre rate applied in the spring (7)IdaGold meal at 0.5 ton/acre rate applied in the fall and the spring (9)winter wheat cover crop; and (9) a no treatment control, with eachtreatment replicated twice.

As of the date of this report, the fall and spring seed meal rates havebeen applied. Three weeks after the fall treatment, samples of soil weretaken from each plot for nematode analyses. A further soil sample wastaken after spring treatments and Telone application. The new cherrytrees will be transplanted in Mid-May.

Vegetables and Wheat

Five crops were chosen for this study (rutabaga, cabbage, bean, lettuceand wheat). Wheat was included as we wanted to include a monocot andalso as wheat is highly adapted to this region. The trial area wasdivided into 5 treatment strips 20 feet wide. Treatments were: B. napus,B. juncea and S. alba seed meals at 1 ton/acre rate, plus a chemicalcontrol treatment and a non-treatment control. Each treatment wasreplicated twice. Seed meal was applied by hand and roto-tilled to adepth of 4 inches prior to being irrigated (1 inch). Crops were plantedusing a double disc seed drill 21 days after treatment.

Variates Recorded

On each trial, general plant health was visibly assessed on a dailybasis for 21 days after emergence. Plant emergence rates were recordedon all trials. Crop yield was recorded on all crops as they becamemarketable. Ant disease on plants or harvested product was recorded.

Weed plant counts were recorded on a 1-m² plot area on all plots atweekly intervals. Weed biomass was taken 10 weeks after planting. Weedplants from 1 m² were clipped at ground level, bagged, and oven driedbefore weights were recorded.

Crop emergence of potato and corn were not affected by any of the seedapplication treatments. Indeed, the smallest and later emerging cropswere always in the non-treatment control. Overall there was nosignificant difference in crop emergence or establishment over alltreatments.

All seed meal treatments resulted in a significant reduction in thenumber of weed plants compared to the non-treatment control in bothpotato and corn. Amongst the seed meal treatments, S. alba meal was mosteffective in weed control and indeed was not significantly higher thanthe chemical control in either potato (Sencor) or corn (Harmony Extra).Least effect weed control was in the B. juncea treatments where over 3times the weed plants were found compared to S. alba.

None of the strawberry plants transplanted in failed to establish in anytreatment. It was evident in the few days after transplanting that therewas visibly more browning around the leaf margin. This browning was moststriking in the Ever Bearing cultivar which has large thin leavescompared to June Bearing. The symptoms were markedly stronger in the S.alba treatments compared to the other seed meals used.

Weed control in the strawberry trial was striking. On average thenon-treatment control had 35 weed plants/m². The chemical control(actually hand weeding) had almost none. The B. napus treatments had onaverage 12 weeds/m², The B. juncea slightly better with 8 weedplants/m². However, there were almost no weeds in the S. alba, which wasequivalent to the chemical control.

Weed control in the cherry orchard was equally as striking as thestrawberry with mass weed populations (mainly pigweed and lambsquarter)in all treatments except the IdaGold treatments. Initial nematode countsafter the fall treatments of The Dalles on-farm test were are follows:no treatment control=1,203 nematodes; winter wheat cover crop=1,197nematodes; IdaGold soil amendment=701 nematodes; Pacific Gold soilamendment=232 nematodes. The Telone treatment is spring only.

Crop emergence was more erratic in the vegetables than in the othercrops. Overall, however, there was no significant difference betweensoil treatments and crop emergence, and indeed if a trend did exist itwas that the ‘better’ crop emergence was in the S. alba treatmentscompared to the other seed meal treatments.

Weed control in the vegetable trial was as striking as that in thestrawberry plots. The results were very similar to those above. Weedswere devastating in all crops without any treatment, averaging more than25 weeds/m². Both B. napus and B. juncea treatments resulted in asignificant reduction in weed populations; they were both significantlyhigher than the complete control. S. alba meal treatment resulted in theelimination of almost all weeds in all crops and was not significantlydifferent from the complete control treatment.

Corn yield in the Pacific Gold and Athena treatment was notsignificantly different from the chemical control, but the IdaGold cornwas significantly lower yielding as was the no treatment control.Highest potato yield was obtained after Pacific Gold and Athenaapplication, followed by IdaGold, the chemical control and lowest potatoyield was with the no treatment control. Highest yield of strawberry waswith the chemical control. All three seed meal treatments producedhigher strawberry yield than the control. IdaGold treatment producedsignificantly higher cabbage yield than other treatments as did thechemical control with lettuce production. Lettuce appeared to be leastsensitive to IdaGold meal treatments.

The overall conclusion from this study is that Brassica seed meals havelittle or no effect on the crop of crops planted or transplanted 21 daysafter treatment. Both B. napus and B. juncea seed meal treatmentssignificantly reduced weed populations over a no treatment control. S.alba seed meal treatments almost eliminated all weed growth and theweeds that did emerge could easily have been explained by less thanfully effective seed meal incorporation.

Overall, seed meal treatments were as productive as the chemical controlfor most crops. IdaGold treatment appeared to have residual negativeeffect on corn and lettuce growth.

Example 10

Two studies were conducted to examine the effects of amending soil withdefatted Brassicaceae meal on the establishment of weed seedlings. Basedon the observations of greenhouse and field experiments, the meal fromSinapis alba “IdaGold” appears to have the greatest potential foreffective weed control. In an effort to better understand the doseresponse of weed seed germination and establishment, the followingstudies were performed:

1. Incorporation of IdaGold meal at 8 rates with 3 weed species 2.Top-dressing of IdaGold meal at 8 rates with 2 weed species

Meal was obtained from the University of Idaho's onsite crushingfacility. The seed used to produce the meal was #1 grade seed purchasedthrough the Genesee Union. Meal rates were determined as a percentage ofthe dry soil weight and ranged from 0 to 0.97%. The highest rate isequivalent to an application of 4 tons per acre incorporated into thetop three inches of soil.

Redroot pigweed, wild oat, and common lambsquarter seed was receivedfrom an associate of Dr. Donn Thill. A germination test was performedfollowing the 1^(st) experiment, which showed a lack of germinationviability in the stock of common lamb squarter seed. Weed seeds wereeither hand-counted (wild oat) or carefully weighed (pigweed andlambsquarter) into proper allotments and then planted into rows randomlypositioned within the trays.

The soil used was obtained from a local organically-managed farm (MaryJane Butter's Paradise Farm) and was passed through a 2 mm screen. Whilethis soil has not been chemically or texturally analyzed, it appears tobe a fine silt-loam rich with organic matter (an analyses is planned forthis soil). Weighed allotments of soil were amended with meal either bymixing them together in a container prior to pouring the soil into aseedling tray (incorporation) or by sprinkling the meal onto the soilafter it had been poured and leveled in the tray (top-dressing).

Each tray thus consisted of two rows of each weed species and wasamended with meal at a rate of 0, 0.06, 0.12, 0.18, 0.24, 0.30, 0.49,0.73, or 0.97% of dry soil weight. Each treatment was replicated fivetimes, and the experiment was conducted following a randomized completeblock design.

The moment the trays were watered initiated time zero, the trays weresubsequently watered daily for two weeks; afterwards they were wateredtwice a week. Although daily emergence data was collected, the finaltotal of emerged and established seedlings is of much greater interest.It should be noted that a delay in the emergence of weeds may providethe desired level of weed control in some situations. However, in thisstudy the focus was on the dose response of the weeds to the amount ofmeal amendment. Both species (pigweed and wild oat) responded negativelyto increasing levels of meal amendment (FIG. 6).

TABLE 13 Number of established seedlings vs. dose of meal Dosepigweed-inc pigweed-top wild oat-inc wild oat-top 0 84.2 27 25.2 26.20.06 68.4 24.2 30 24.2 0.12 26.2 11 19.8 26.6 0.18 10.8 10.4 22.4 220.24 9 10.2 19.8 21.2 0.3 7.6 2 12.8 17.8 0.49 1.2 1.4 9 11.8 0.73 1.21.2 2.8 11.8 0.97 2 0.6 3.8 6.6

S. alba or “IdaGold” meal is useful as a soil amendment for weedcontrol. The methodology might be modified by changing the depth ofplanting, scarifying the seed prior to use, etc. Since there appears tobe no appreciable difference between incorporation and top-dressing,future top-dressing only may be the most practical method of applying.

Example 11

This example discusses using the method for pest control comprisingdisclosed embodiments of the present invention by extracting intactglucosinolates, such as 4-hydroxybenzyl glucosinolate, and applying theextract to soil either as a top dressing or by incorporating the extracta certain depth into the soil, such as from 0.25 to about 5.0centimeters. Plant tissue is extracted with an extractant, such as anaqueous alcohol, e.g. methanol, solution. The plant tissue optionallymay be pressed, such as by cold pressing, prior to extraction. Selectedglucosinolates are obtained as extracts by this procedure.

In a first embodiment, extracted glucosinolate is applied to selectedsoil at a desired application rate selected for pest control.Thereafter, an effective amount of myrosinase enzyme also is added tothe soil to produce active biopesticides.

Alternatively, the extracted glucosinolate can be combined with themyrosinase to form a mixture, and then the mixture is applied toselected soil at a desired application rate selected for pest control.

Another possibility for effective utilization of S. alba meal as anherbicide is to add water to the meal, causing enzymatic hydrolysis of4-OH benzyl glucosinolate by the contained myrosinase. The resultingaqueous solution that now contains SCN⁻ could then be applied as a sprayto soil or to the weed itself. To facilitate such a process a volume ofS. alba meal could be enclosed or encapsulated in a container that wouldallow water penetration. The capsule or container could be dropped in aknown volume of water, thus promoting hydrolysis of the contained 4-OHbenzyl glucosinolate and providing a recommended SCN⁻ rate adequate forweed control. The resulting SCN⁻ solution could then be sprayed on soilor directly on weeds without the need to apply meal.

Example 12

Seed meal from S. alba (yellow mustard) was evaluated for effects onseed germination and establishment compared to a no treatment control.Seedling flats (26 by 52 by 7.5 cm) were filled with potting media andthen 4 grams each of wild oat or 1 gram of redroot pigweed seeds weresprinkled on the media surface and thoroughly mixed into the pottingmedia. The meal treatments were 0.5 and 1.0 metric t/ha, equivalentsweight by area, of IdaGold yellow mustard meal. Seed meal was thoroughlymixed into the soil in flats after seeding the weed seeds. Theexperimental design was a randomized complete block with fourreplicates, and the experiment was conducted three times. Immediatelyafter incorporation of the meal, all flats were watered equally with 3centimeters of water to encourage glucosinolate hydrolysis. Seedlingsemergence counts and above ground plant biomass after three weeks growthwere determined.

Only the higher application of S. alba seed meal resulted in asignificant reduction in redroot pigweed (Table 14). However, both theS. alba application rates produced significantly lower redroot pigweedbiomass compared to the no-treatment control. Similarly, the S. albameal amended soils resulted in significantly lower wild oat seedlingsand significantly lower weed biomass compared to the no-treatmentcontrol. In conclusion, S. alba seed meal showed significant herbicidaleffects compared to a no-treatment control.

TABLE 14 Weed count and biomass from meal amended soils and ano-treatment control. Redroot Pigweed Wild Oat Weed Weed Weed Weed Ratecount Biomass count Biomass Treatment Mt ha ⁻¹ Plant m² g m² Plant m² gm² No meal 0 150 a  0.729 a 99 a 9.6 a S. alba 0.5 99 ab 0.159 b 67 b6.6 b meal 1.0 45 b  0.139 b 41 c 4.3 c Means within columns withdifferent letters are significantly different (P < 0.05)

Example 13

Two ton/acre equivalent seed meal rates of Sinapis alba L. (IdaGold)were used as soil amendment treatments along with a no-treatmentcontrol. The S. alba meal was incorporated by hilling or tilling the toptwo inches of soil. Two weeks after seed meal was incorporated cropswere planted, including lettuce (Lactuca sativa), field beans (Phaseolusspp.), cabbage (B. oleracea), strawberries (Fragaria×ananassa Duchesne),corn (Zea mays), and potatoes (Solanum tuberosum). Experiments wereplanted in a split plot design with soil treatments assigned as mainplots and crops assigned to sub-plots. All crops were hand harvested.

Weed density was significantly different between S. alba soil amendmenttreatments compared to the no-treatment control in all crops examined(Table 15). In conclusion S. alba (IdaGold) was most effective inreducing weed populations and in most cases weed control was excellent.

TABLE 15 Weed population in different crops planted into soil amendedwith S. alba seed meal and from a no-treatment control. S. alba mealNo-treatment amended soils control Crop Weed plants m² Corn 14.0 a 2.2 bPotato 13.5 a 2.0 b Strawberry 34.5 a 1.0 b Cabbage 21.2 a 0.1 b Lettuce28.0 a 0.2 b Field Bean 32.3 a 0.2 b Average 23.9 a 0.9 b Means withinrows with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05)

Example 14

Studies were established in a greenhouse at the University of Idaho,Moscow, Id. in winter 2006 to evaluate the effect of water extractionsof S. alba seed meal on the growth of common lambsquarters, ‘Yaya’carrot, green ‘Summer Crisp’ lettuce, and spring wheat. Greenhouse flatswere 20 by 28 by 5 cm, arranged in a randomized complete block designwith six replications. S. alba mustard seed meal applications equivalentto 2.2, 4.5, 9, 13.5, and 18 metric tons per hectare were extracted withtap-water at room temperature (20° C.) at a 7.3:1 ratio of seed meal totap-water. Extraction was performed by shaking seed meal in Erlenmeyerflasks for 30 minutes at 300 rpm. Supernatants were strained 3 timeswith a 28 mesh screen to remove precipitated material. Twenty seeds ofcommon lambsquarters, ‘Yaya’ carrot, green ‘Summer Crisp’ lettuce, andspring wheat were planted in rows 14 days prior to treatment. Greenhousetemperatures were set at 23/12° C. day and night, respectively, with aphotoperiod of 16/8 hours day and night, respectively. Above groundseedling biomass was harvested by species 16 days after treatment.Seedling biomass was dried at 15° C. for 72 hours and weighed.

A general trend of decreasing plant biomass with increasing doses of S.alba seed meal supernatant extraction was observed (FIG. 27). The largereduction in plant biomass between a dose of 0 and a dose of 2.2 metrict/ha indicates that reduction in plant biomass at doses lower than 2.2metric t/ha may be possible. While common lambsquarters, ‘Yaya’ Carrot,and ‘Summer Crisp’ lettuce were all reduced to a plant biomass of 0 witha dose of 13.5 metric t/ha, spring wheat showed some tolerance to thetreatment, as indicated by an almost flat dose response between 9 and 18metric t/ha.

Examples 15-17

The potatoes for Examples 15-17 were hand harvested and shipped threedays later. The potatoes were placed in a dark room at 50° F. for onemonth to cure and to allow gradual removal of field heat.

Example 15 B. juncea Extracts Control Potato Sprouting

One gallon jars each holding approximately 4 lbs of potatoes were usedfor testing. Three jars were filled with actively sprouting potatoes toserve as the untreated controls. Three additional jars served as theextract treatments. One gram of the B. juncea meal extract (360sinigrin/g) was weighed into ajar lid. The filled lid was placed inbottom center of each treatment jar. A wire rack was placed over the lidcontaining the meal. Actively sprouting potatoes were placed within thejar. Using a pipette, 7 ml of water was added to a long ventilation tubethat was strategically placed over the meal. After water was added, theventilation tubes were stoppered and the jars were sealed for 24 hours.The potatoes were stored for 24 hours at 51° F. in a dark room afterwhich time the stoppers were removed from the ventilation tubes. Thejars were then stored at 55° F. and monitored. Sprouting was observed atfour and eight weeks after treatment (WAT) (Table 16). The B. junceaextract provided nearly complete sprout inhibition indicating excellentpotential to be used as a sprout inhibitor of stored potatoes (FIGS. 28and 29).

TABLE 16 Sprouting index of potatoes treated with B. juncea extract asmeasured 4 and 8 weeks after treatment. Sprouting Index^(a) Treatment 4WAT 8 WAT Untreated control 2.7 3.8 B. juncea treatment 0.5 0^(a)Sprouting index is on a scale from 0-40, with 0 indicating nosprouting and 5 indicating a level of concern to processors.

Example 16 Dose-Dependent Response of B. juncea Extracts to ControlPotato Sprouting

Potatoes were dormant at the start of the testing. Three jars werefilled with tubers, but were untreated in order to serve as controls.Nine additional jars were filled with potatoes. Jars were filled aspreviously described in Example 15, but one half of a petri dish wasused to hold the extract inside the jar. The following treatments wereincluded, with 3 jars or replicates each: 1 g extract/7 ml of water; 0.5g of extract/7 ml of water; and 0.25 g extract/7 ml of water.

The jars were all sealed for 24 hours then unsealed, hooked toventilation, and placed in the dark at 50° F. for observation ofsprouting. No sprouting was observed in the 0.5 and 1.0 g extracttreatment groups, and much reduced sprouting was observed in the 0.25 gextract treatment group (Table 17 and FIGS. 30-33).

TABLE 17 Sprouting index of potatoes treated with B. juncea extract asmeasured 3 and 7 weeks after treatment. Sprouting Index^(a) Treatment 3WAT 7 WAT Untreated control 7.4 8.3 B. juncea treatment, 0.25 g 0.3 1.4B. juncea treatment, 0.5 g 0 0 B. juncea treatment, 1.0 g 0 0^(a)Sprouting index is on a scale from 0-40, with 0 indicating nosprouting and 5 indicating a level of concern to processors.

Example 17 B. juncea Extracts Control Sprouting in Large Scale PotatoStorage

Two hundred pounds of potatoes placed within a metal barrel were treatedwith 1 gram of mustard extract containing about 898 μmol sinigrin/g. Two200-lb barrels were filled with potatoes exhibiting initial stages ofsprouting. One barrel served as an untreated control and potatoes in theother were treated. The treatment group received 1 gram of extract towhich was added 7 ml of water in a petri dish. The barrel wasimmediately sealed. The barrels were stored at a room temperature of 69°F. for 24 hours after which time they were opened for ventilation.Barrels were then stored in the dark at 50° F. At one month aftertreatment, the treatment group showed substantially less sprouting thanthe untreated control (FIGS. 34 and 35). Inhibition continued to thesecond month after treatment. The treatment group was given a secondextract treatment eight weeks after the initial treatment. The secondtreatment was the same as the first, namely 1 gram extract/7 ml H₂O andsealed for 24 hour of exposure. One month after the second treatment,the potatoes were examined. Potatoes in the treatment group continued toshow inhibition of sprouting. The average sprout index of the treatmentgroup was 0.7, whereas the untreated control had a sprout index of 2.0.The barrel was resealed for another two months and evaluated. Theuntreated control had a sprout index 12.7, whereas the treatment grouphad a sprout index of 1.4 at the top, 3.4 in the middle, and 2.4 at thebottom (Table 18). Twenty weeks after treatment the extract-treatedpotatoes had a sprouting index deemed acceptable by processors as it wasbelow a sprouting index of 5. In contrast, the untreated control groupshowed unacceptable sprouting for processing, with a sprouting index of12.7.

TABLE 18 Sprouting index of potatoes treated with B. juncea extract asmeasured in the barrel study. Sprouting Index (weeks aftertreatment)^(a) Treatment Initial 4 8 12 20 Untreated control 3 9.7 4.02.0 12.7 B. juncea treatment, 1 g 2.2 3.0 1.9 0.7 2.4 ^(a)Sproutingindex is on a scale from 0-40, with 0 indicating no sprouting and 5indicating a level of concern to processors. Values represent averagesof three estimates measured at different depths in the barrel.

Example 18 Sinapis alba Extract as a Herbicide

An aqueous Sinapis alba extract was applied to the leaves of Nicotianaplants and leaves of tomato plants by spraying the plants with anaqueous extract. Progressive phytotoxicity was observed over time,illustrating that the S. alba extract had herbicidal properties (FIGS.36-41). Typically, after two weeks, the previously health leaves startedto turn yellow. After three weeks, there was substantial yellowing ofthe leaves, illustrating the herbicidal properties of the S. albaextract. This also illustrated that plants in addition to liverwort weresusceptible to the herbicidal properties of S. alba extracts.

XI. Statements

Statement 1. A method, comprising:

extracting a plant material selected from Sinapis alba or Brassicajuncea with an extraction solvent comprising an alcohol and water toproduce an extract; and

concentrating and drying the extract by spray drying or belt drying toproduce a non-deliquescent solid.

Statement 2. The method of statement 1, wherein the extraction solventcomprises from 10% to 90% alcohol and from 90% to 10% water.

Statement 3. The method of statement 1 or statement 2, wherein thealcohol comprises methanol, ethanol or a combination thereof.

Statement 4. The method of any one of statements 1-3, wherein the plantmaterial is a seed meal.

Statement 5. The method of any one of statements 1-4, comprisinghomogenizing and/or grinding the plant material prior to the extraction.

Statement 6. The method of any one of statements 1-5, wherein the plantmaterial is Sinapis alba, and the extraction solvent comprises 30%ethanol and 70% water.

Statement 7. The method of statement 6, wherein the extract is spraydried.

Statement 8. The method of statement 6 or statement 7, comprisingextracting Sinapis alba for a period of up to at least 3 days, andwherein the extract comprises 4-hydroxybenzyl alcohol and4-hydroxyphenylacetonitrile.

Statement 9. The method of any one of statements 1-5, wherein the plantmaterial is Brassica juncea and the extraction solvent is 70% ethanoland 30% water.

Statement 10. The method of statement 9, wherein the extract is beltdried.

Statement 11. A method, comprising applying to liverwort or the soiladjacent thereto, an extract comprising 4-hydroxybenzyl alcohol and4-hydroxyphenylacetonitrile produced by the method of any one ofstatements 1-8.

Statement 12. A method of preventing or substantially inhibiting potatosprouts during storage, the method comprising applying to the potatoesSinapis alba seed meal, Brassica juncea seed meal, or the extractproduced by the method of any one of statements 1-10.

Statement 13. The method of statement 11 or statement 12, wherein theextract is formulated for application by a sprinkler or spraying deviceby dissolved the extract in water.

In view of the many possible embodiments to which the principles of thedisclosed invention may be applied, it should be recognized that theillustrated embodiments are only preferred examples of the invention andshould not be taken as limiting the scope of the invention. Rather, thescope of the invention is defined by the following claims. We thereforeclaim as our invention all that comes within the scope and spirit ofthese claims.

We claim:
 1. A method, comprising exposing vegetables to products generated by exposing an effective amount of Brassica juncea seed meal or extract or a combination thereof to water thereby substantially prevent sprouting in the vegetables.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the products comprise 2-propenyl isothiocyanate.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein the vegetables are bulb vegetables, corm vegetables, tuber vegetables, or a combination thereof.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the vegetables comprise potatoes.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein exposing the vegetables comprises applying the products to the vegetables.
 6. The method of claim 5, wherein applying the products comprises spraying or fogging.
 7. The method of claim 1, comprising using an amount of Brassica juncea seed meal, Brassica juncea seed meal extract or a combination thereof, of from greater than zero to one gram per 225 kg of vegetables.
 8. The method of claim 7, wherein the amount of Brassica juncea seed meal, Brassica juncea seed meal extract or a combination thereof, is from one gram per 1.5 kg to one gram per 50 kg of vegetables.
 9. The method of claim 7, wherein the amount of Brassica juncea seed meal, Brassica juncea seed meal extract or a combination thereof, is from 0.02 grams per kg of vegetables to 0.667 grams per kg of vegetables.
 10. The method of claim 1, wherein generating the products comprises using an amount of water of from 1 mL to 30 mL per gram of Brassica juncea seed meal, Brassica juncea seed meal extract or a combination thereof.
 11. The method of claim 1, wherein the vegetables comprise potatoes selected from Russet Burbank, Russet Norkotah, Western Russet, Cal Red, Red La Soda, Norland, French Fingerling, Russian Banana, Purple Peruvian, Yukon Gold, Yukon Gem, Ruby Crescent, Yellow Finn, Huckleberry, Ida Rose, Klondike Golddust, Klondike Rose, Milva, Ranger Russet, All Blue, Alturas Russet, Brannock Russet, Bintje, Blazer Russet, Classic Russet, Clearwater Russet, Onaway, Elba, Carola, Oliense, Cecil, Allian, Agata, Russet Alpine, Rosara, Chieftan, Dark Red Norland, Red Norland, Innovator, Shepody, California White, or a combination thereof.
 12. The method of claim 1, comprising spraying or fogging an atmosphere of a vegetable storage facility with an aqueous composition comprising a volatile product formed by a mixture of water and Brassica seed meal, Brassica juncea seed meal or a combination thereof, thereby preventing vegetable stored in the storage facility from sprouting.
 13. The method of claim 12, wherein the volatile product comprises 2-propenyl isothiocyanate.
 14. A method, comprising exposing vegetables stored in a storage facility to 2-propenyl isothiocyanate in an amount sufficient to substantially prevent vegetables stored in the storage facility from sprouting.
 15. The method of claim 14, wherein the 2-propenyl isothiocyanate is adjacent to the vegetables.
 16. The method of claim 14, wherein the 2-propenyl isothiocyanate is sprayed or fogged on to the vegetables. 